Skip to main content

Research · Pattern studies · Cup & Handle

ChartDatabase Research · Chart pattern study

Cup & Handle Pattern

Timeframe

1h timeframe — 75 snapshots across 73 Binance USDT‑M futures markets — bullish bias. Results are not mixed with other candle intervals.

Abstract

Cup & Handle statistics on the 1h timeframe only (n=75). Timeframes are analyzed separately and never pooled — 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d horizons are not interchangeable. Use the timeframe control under the title to switch. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways: 57.33% / 42.67% / 0.0%.

Keywords Cup & Handle patternCup & Handle breakoutCup & Handle cryptohow to trade Cup & HandleCup & Handle success ratecup and handle patterncup and handle cryptocrypto chart patternschart pattern success rate

Key results (1h only)

Key findings
  1. Cup & Handle on 1h: n=75 snapshots across 73 coins — breakout 57.33%, breakdown 42.67%, sideways 0.0% (exclusive classes; not pooled with other timeframes).
  2. Expected-direction (bullish) hit rate on 1h: 57.33%.
  3. Mean max-up / max-down on 1h: 4.919% / -3.046% (MFE÷|MAE| ≈ 1.615); median 20-candle close return 0.243%.
Snapshots
75
Coins
73unique symbols
Hit rate
57.33%expected direction
Breakout
57.33%exclusive
Breakdown
42.67%exclusive
Sideways
0.0%neither
Median ret.
0.243%
MFE ÷ |MAE|
1.615

Scope for this pattern

  • Exchange / market: Binance USD-M Futures (perpetual contracts).
  • Pattern end: For Cup & Handle, pattern end is handle completion: the first rim-line touch within ±0.5× NATR(14) after the handle low — the pattern is “ready,” not yet past a full breakout. Outcomes are tracked across 20 forward bars.
  • Active timeframe: 1h only — other intervals (15m, 1h, 4h) are available via the control under the title and are never mixed into these figures.
  • Outcome horizon: next 20 candles on the selected timeframe. Headline KPIs use pattern-end snapshots: mutually exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). Fuel and RSI bins on trendline families also report Forming (still inside the lines).

Results (1h)

Return distribution

All figures below are for Cup & Handle on the 1h timeframe only (n=75). Timeframes are never pooled — a 15m candle horizon is not comparable to 1d. Mean return 1.304%, median 0.243%; exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways 57.33% / 42.67% / 0.0%. Mean MFE / MAE 4.919% / -3.046%.

Figure 1. 20-candle close return (%) for Cup & Handle on 1h, clipped to ±16%.

Wick max-up / max-down over the same 20-candle window, expressed as NATR multiples. Sideways is not a spike at 0.

Figure 1b. 20-candle wick max-up (×NATR) on 1h.

Figure 1c. 20-candle wick max-down (×NATR).

Distribution statistics

  • Mean return: 1.304%
  • Median: 0.243% (P25 -1.867 · P75 3.322)
  • Std. deviation: 5.176%
  • Win rate (ret > 0): 52.0%
  • Mean MFE / MAE: 4.919% / -3.046%
  • Median max-up / max-down (×NATR): 2.125 / -1.588
  • Sideways rate: % (pattern-end unresolved; not a zero-move class; see ×NATR histograms)
  • Both-cleared (pre-label): 34.67%

Fuel volume & momentum scores

Fuel volume and momentum scores below use only Cup & Handle snapshots on 1h. Zones match the live Fuel gauge (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg); each zone reports mean max-up / max-down over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

volume_score (n=75; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 56.86% in Organic Flow (0.34–0.66) to 63.64% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a substantial difference of +6.78 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 43.14% to 36.36% (-6.78 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 56.86% in Organic Flow to 63.64% in The Powder Keg (+6.78 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in The Powder Keg (7.327%), compared with 4.053% in Organic Flow and 7.327% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 12% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=51
BO 56.86% BD 43.14% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=22
BO 63.64% BD 36.36% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by Fuel volume score.

Empirical density of volume score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel volume score.

volume_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 51 4.053 -3.208 56.86 43.14 0.0 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 22 7.327 -2.748 63.64 36.36 0.0 0.0

momentum_score (n=75; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 50.98% in Organic Flow (0.34–0.66) to 70.83% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a substantial difference of +19.85 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 49.02% to 29.17% (-19.85 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 50.98% in Organic Flow to 70.83% in The Powder Keg (+19.85 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in The Powder Keg (6.915%), compared with 3.979% in Organic Flow and 6.915% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 27% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=51
BO 50.98% BD 49.02% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=24
BO 70.83% BD 29.17% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by Fuel momentum score.

Empirical density of momentum score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel momentum score.

momentum_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 51 3.979 -2.915 50.98 49.02 0.0 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 24 6.915 -3.324 70.83 29.17 0.0 0.0

Feature distributions vs max-up / max-down

Feature bins below use only Cup & Handle snapshots on 1h. Each bin reports mean max-up (MFE) and mean max-down (MAE) over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

geom_height (n=75; last snapshot per formation)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded pattern height (price span of the formation) are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 52.63% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 0.0391 – 0.0459) to 52.63% in the highest (Q4; 0.0706 – 0.117), a negligible difference of 0.00 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 47.37% to 47.37% (0.00 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 52.63% in Q1 to 52.63% in Q4 (0.00 percentage points; negligible shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (7.835%), compared with 3.522% in Q1 and 7.835% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower pattern height readings (peak bin ≈ 23% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on pattern height (price span of the formation) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q10.0391 – 0.0459
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%
Q20.0459 – 0.0524
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%
Q30.0524 – 0.0706
n=18
BO 72.22% BD 27.78% SW 0.0%
Q40.0706 – 0.117
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by height.

The histogram shows the empirical density of height for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of pattern height.

geom_height bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 0.0391 – 0.0459 19 3.522 -3.258 52.63 47.37 0.0
Q2 0.0459 – 0.0524 19 3.222 -2.339 52.63 47.37 0.0
Q3 0.0524 – 0.0706 18 5.107 -2.336 72.22 27.78 0.0
Q4 0.0706 – 0.117 19 7.835 -4.214 52.63 47.37 0.0

geom_width (n=75; last snapshot per formation)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded pattern width (duration in candles) are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 66.67% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 30 – 33) to 52.63% in the highest (Q4; 44.5 – 77), a substantial difference of -14.04 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 33.33% to 47.37% (+14.04 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 66.67% in Q1 to 52.63% in Q4 (-14.04 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (7.209%), compared with 3.687% in Q1 and 7.209% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower pattern width readings (peak bin ≈ 27% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on pattern width (duration in candles) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q130 – 33
n=24
BO 66.67% BD 33.33% SW 0.0%
Q233 – 37
n=18
BO 50.0% BD 50.0% SW 0.0%
Q337 – 44.5
n=14
BO 57.14% BD 42.86% SW 0.0%
Q444.5 – 77
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by width.

The histogram shows the empirical density of width for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of pattern width.

geom_width bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 30 – 33 24 3.687 -2.888 66.67 33.33 0.0
Q2 33 – 37 18 4.972 -3.239 50.0 50.0 0.0
Q3 37 – 44.5 14 3.853 -3.253 57.14 42.86 0.0
Q4 44.5 – 77 19 7.209 -2.909 52.63 47.37 0.0

geom_breakout_potential (n=75; last snapshot per formation)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded breakout-potential score from pattern geometry are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 52.63% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 0.0391 – 0.0459) to 52.63% in the highest (Q4; 0.0706 – 0.117), a negligible difference of 0.00 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 47.37% to 47.37% (0.00 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 52.63% in Q1 to 52.63% in Q4 (0.00 percentage points; negligible shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (7.835%), compared with 3.522% in Q1 and 7.835% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower breakout-potential score from pattern geometry readings (peak bin ≈ 23% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on breakout-potential score from pattern geometry alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q10.0391 – 0.0459
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%
Q20.0459 – 0.0524
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%
Q30.0524 – 0.0706
n=18
BO 72.22% BD 27.78% SW 0.0%
Q40.0706 – 0.117
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by breakout potential.

The histogram shows the empirical density of breakout potential for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of breakout-potential score from pattern geometry.

geom_breakout_potential bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 0.0391 – 0.0459 19 3.522 -3.258 52.63 47.37 0.0
Q2 0.0459 – 0.0524 19 3.222 -2.339 52.63 47.37 0.0
Q3 0.0524 – 0.0706 18 5.107 -2.336 72.22 27.78 0.0
Q4 0.0706 – 0.117 19 7.835 -4.214 52.63 47.37 0.0

btc_dist14_mean (n=75; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded BTC last-14 mean distance are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 63.16% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -3.18 – -1.25) to 52.63% in the highest (Q4; -0.183 – 0.758), a substantial difference of -10.53 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 36.84% to 47.37% (+10.53 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 63.16% in Q1 to 52.63% in Q4 (-10.53 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q2 (5.489%), compared with 3.579% in Q1 and 5.288% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 15% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on BTC last-14 mean distance alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-3.18 – -1.25
n=19
BO 63.16% BD 36.84% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%
Q2-1.25 – -0.694
n=19
BO 57.89% BD 42.11% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%
Q3-0.694 – -0.183
n=18
BO 55.56% BD 44.44% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%
Q4-0.183 – 0.758
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by btc mean.

The histogram shows the empirical density of btc mean for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of BTC last-14 mean distance.

btc_dist14_mean bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Q1 -3.18 – -1.25 19 3.579 -3.416 63.16 36.84 0.0 0.0
Q2 -1.25 – -0.694 19 5.489 -3.113 57.89 42.11 0.0 0.0
Q3 -0.694 – -0.183 18 5.342 -2.648 55.56 44.44 0.0 0.0
Q4 -0.183 – 0.758 19 5.288 -2.986 52.63 47.37 0.0 0.0

current_scale_number (n=75; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout) are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 36.84% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 0.759 – 0.925) to 78.95% in the highest (Q4; 1.03 – 1.19), a substantial difference of +42.11 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 63.16% to 21.05% (-42.11 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 36.84% in Q1 to 78.95% in Q4 (+42.11 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q2 (6.569%), compared with 5.281% in Q1 and 3.507% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 13% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q10.759 – 0.925
n=19
BO 36.84% BD 63.16% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%
Q20.925 – 0.972
n=19
BO 57.89% BD 42.11% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%
Q30.972 – 1.03
n=18
BO 55.56% BD 44.44% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%
Q41.03 – 1.19
n=19
BO 78.95% BD 21.05% SW -0.0% FM 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by Pattern scale.

The histogram shows the empirical density of Pattern scale for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of position in the live channel.

current_scale_number bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Q1 0.759 – 0.925 19 5.281 -2.956 36.84 63.16 0.0 0.0
Q2 0.925 – 0.972 19 6.569 -3.36 57.89 42.11 0.0 0.0
Q3 0.972 – 1.03 18 4.284 -2.919 55.56 44.44 0.0 0.0
Q4 1.03 – 1.19 19 3.507 -2.942 78.95 21.05 -0.0 0.0

geom_cup_depth (n=75; last snapshot per formation)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded cup depth for cup-and-handle formations are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 52.63% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 0.0391 – 0.0459) to 52.63% in the highest (Q4; 0.0706 – 0.117), a negligible difference of 0.00 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 47.37% to 47.37% (0.00 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 52.63% in Q1 to 52.63% in Q4 (0.00 percentage points; negligible shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (7.835%), compared with 3.522% in Q1 and 7.835% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower cup depth for cup-and-handle formations readings (peak bin ≈ 23% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on cup depth for cup-and-handle formations alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q10.0391 – 0.0459
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%
Q20.0459 – 0.0524
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%
Q30.0524 – 0.0706
n=18
BO 72.22% BD 27.78% SW 0.0%
Q40.0706 – 0.117
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by cup depth.

The histogram shows the empirical density of cup depth for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of cup depth for cup-and-handle formations.

geom_cup_depth bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 0.0391 – 0.0459 19 3.522 -3.258 52.63 47.37 0.0
Q2 0.0459 – 0.0524 19 3.222 -2.339 52.63 47.37 0.0
Q3 0.0524 – 0.0706 18 5.107 -2.336 72.22 27.78 0.0
Q4 0.0706 – 0.117 19 7.835 -4.214 52.63 47.37 0.0

geom_cup_width (n=75; last snapshot per formation)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded cup width (candles) for cup-and-handle formations are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 63.64% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 20 – 21) to 47.37% in the highest (Q4; 28.5 – 50), a substantial difference of -16.27 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 36.36% to 52.63% (+16.27 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 63.64% in Q1 to 47.37% in Q4 (-16.27 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q2 (6.598%), compared with 2.933% in Q1 and 6.354% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower cup width readings (peak bin ≈ 29% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on cup width (candles) for cup-and-handle formations alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q120 – 21
n=22
BO 63.64% BD 36.36% SW 0.0%
Q221 – 23
n=16
BO 50.0% BD 50.0% SW 0.0%
Q323 – 28.5
n=18
BO 66.67% BD 33.33% SW 0.0%
Q428.5 – 50
n=19
BO 47.37% BD 52.63% SW 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by cup width.

The histogram shows the empirical density of cup width for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of cup width.

geom_cup_width bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 20 – 21 22 2.933 -3.255 63.64 36.36 0.0
Q2 21 – 23 16 6.598 -2.547 50.0 50.0 0.0
Q3 23 – 28.5 18 4.338 -3.576 66.67 33.33 0.0
Q4 28.5 – 50 19 6.354 -2.722 47.37 52.63 0.0

geom_handle_depth (n=75; last snapshot per formation)

Within Cup & Handle (1h), 75 snapshots with recorded handle depth for cup-and-handle formations are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 57.89% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 0.00563 – 0.0112) to 52.63% in the highest (Q4; 0.0206 – 0.0464), a substantial difference of -5.26 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 42.11% to 47.37% (+5.26 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 57.89% in Q1 to 52.63% in Q4 (-5.26 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (8.886%), compared with 3.221% in Q1 and 8.886% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower handle depth for cup-and-handle formations readings (peak bin ≈ 16% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on handle depth for cup-and-handle formations alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q10.00563 – 0.0112
n=19
BO 57.89% BD 42.11% SW 0.0%
Q20.0112 – 0.0156
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%
Q30.0156 – 0.0206
n=18
BO 66.67% BD 33.33% SW 0.0%
Q40.0206 – 0.0464
n=19
BO 52.63% BD 47.37% SW 0.0%

Cup & Handle outcomes by handle depth.

The histogram shows the empirical density of handle depth for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of handle depth for cup-and-handle formations.

geom_handle_depth bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 0.00563 – 0.0112 19 3.221 -2.734 57.89 42.11 0.0
Q2 0.0112 – 0.0156 19 3.07 -3.076 52.63 47.37 0.0
Q3 0.0156 – 0.0206 18 4.475 -3.055 66.67 33.33 0.0
Q4 0.0206 – 0.0464 19 8.886 -3.32 52.63 47.37 0.0

Timeframe comparison

Side-by-side comparison across timeframes for Cup & Handle. Each column is an independent sample — use it to contrast horizons, not as a pooled average.

Table. Cup & Handle comparative outcomes by timeframe.
TF n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ ↑/|↓| Hit % BO % BD % SW %
15m 4 3.877 -1.167 3.322 75.0 75.0 25.0 0.0
1h 75 4.919 -3.046 1.615 57.33 57.33 42.67 0.0
4h 12 7.493 -6.833 1.097 58.33 58.33 41.67 0.0

Feature correlations

Within Cup & Handle on 1h, the strongest absolute Spearman correlate of breakout is current_scale_number (ρ = 0.2553). Ranks use pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features. * p<0.05 · ** p<0.01 · *** p<0.001.

vs Breakout success

Table 1. Top breakout correlates.
Featureρpn
current_scale_number 0.2553 0.027078 75
momentum_score 0.1868 0.108466 75
volume_score 0.1856 0.110944 75
rsi_14 0.1332 0.254444 75
btc_dist14_mean -0.0934 0.425458 75
geom_width -0.0824 0.482155 75
geom_cup_width -0.0789 0.501135 75
geom_handle_width 0.0545 0.642499 75
geom_height 0.0199 0.865272 75
geom_breakout_potential 0.0199 0.865272 75
geom_cup_depth 0.0199 0.865272 75
geom_handle_depth -0.0112 0.923973 75

vs Breakdown success

Table 2. Top breakdown correlates.
Featureρpn
current_scale_number -0.2553 0.027078 75
momentum_score -0.1868 0.108466 75
volume_score -0.1856 0.110944 75
rsi_14 -0.1332 0.254444 75
btc_dist14_mean 0.0934 0.425458 75
geom_width 0.0824 0.482155 75
geom_cup_width 0.0789 0.501135 75
geom_handle_width -0.0545 0.642499 75
geom_height -0.0199 0.865272 75
geom_breakout_potential -0.0199 0.865272 75
geom_cup_depth -0.0199 0.865272 75
geom_handle_depth 0.0112 0.923973 75
Table 3. Top correlates of 20-candle close return.
Featureρpn
geom_handle_depth 0.2617 0.02331 75
btc_dist14_mean 0.1882 0.105865 75
momentum_score 0.1619 0.165265 75
volume_score 0.1353 0.247228 75
geom_cup_width 0.1159 0.321915 75
geom_handle_width 0.109 0.351956 75
geom_width 0.1049 0.370304 75
geom_height 0.0842 0.472865 75
geom_breakout_potential 0.0842 0.472865 75
geom_cup_depth 0.0842 0.472865 75
rsi_14 0.0502 0.669131 75
current_scale_number -0.0445 0.704828 75
Table 3b. Top correlates of 20-candle max-up (MFE).
Featureρpn
geom_handle_depth 0.2477 0.032177 75
geom_height 0.169 0.147098 75
geom_breakout_potential 0.169 0.147098 75
geom_cup_depth 0.169 0.147098 75
momentum_score 0.1689 0.147366 75
volume_score 0.1409 0.227808 75
current_scale_number -0.1331 0.254902 75
geom_handle_width 0.1302 0.26558 75
btc_dist14_mean 0.0996 0.395408 75
rsi_14 0.0593 0.613365 75
geom_width 0.0578 0.622292 75
geom_cup_width 0.0467 0.690926 75
Table 3c. Top correlates of 20-candle max-down (MAE).
Featureρpn
btc_dist14_mean 0.1827 0.116576 75
geom_height -0.118 0.31317 75
geom_breakout_potential -0.118 0.31317 75
geom_cup_depth -0.118 0.31317 75
geom_handle_depth -0.1174 0.315761 75
volume_score 0.0934 0.425229 75
geom_cup_width 0.0689 0.556815 75
rsi_14 0.0495 0.673378 75
geom_width 0.0436 0.710237 75
current_scale_number -0.0379 0.746677 75
geom_handle_width -0.0272 0.816859 75
momentum_score 0.0089 0.939726 75

Outcome mix by timeframe

Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways rates by candle timeframe (hover for exact values).

Figure 2. Stacked exclusive outcome rates by timeframe.

Timeframe breakdown

Table 6. Cup & Handle split by timeframe.
TF n Coins Hit % BO % BD % SW % Med % Mean %
15m 4 4 75.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 1.935 1.26
1h 75 73 57.33 57.33 42.67 0.0 0.243 1.304
4h 12 12 58.33 58.33 41.67 0.0 -0.968 -2.063

Methods note

Shared methodology (expand)

Pattern end for this study: For Cup & Handle, pattern end is handle completion: the first rim-line touch within ±0.5× NATR(14) after the handle low — the pattern is “ready,” not yet past a full breakout. Outcomes are tracked across 20 forward bars.

Outcomes use mutually exclusive classes over the next 20 candles. Headline KPIs and geometry bins are pattern-end: breakout, breakdown, or sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). On trendline families, Fuel / RSI bins add Forming (still inside the lines). Correlations are Spearman with two-sided p-values. See the research hub methods for universe, how every pattern family defines pattern end, dedupe keys, and limitations.

Exclusive class: upside clears +1× natr_14 within 20 candles before downside.
Exclusive class: downside clears −1× natr_14 within 20 candles before upside.
Pattern-end (terminal) unresolved class: neither +1× nor −1× natr_14 cleared within 20 candles after the breached candle. Headline KPIs, ranks, and geometry bins use this sample; Forming is not in that formula. Sideways is not a zero-move class; typical wick travel inside the bands is reported as ×NATR max-up / max-down.
Trendline families only, and only on non-terminal snapshots still inside the lines: neither side tagged within 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins add Forming so four exclusive classes sum to 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%.
$$\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}$$

Labels use ground-truth path outcomes (outcome_label / target_first_hit from full kline OHLC path). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Unresolved non-terminal trendline snapshots are Forming; unresolved terminal snapshots are Sideways. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open proximity, then candle body polarity, then return sign. Pattern-end headline rates: breakout + breakdown + sideways = 100%. Forming+terminal Fuel/RSI bins: breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%.

Limitations & disclosures

  1. This is a historical, in-sample statistical study — not a forward-tested trading strategy. It excludes exchange fees, funding rates, slippage, and execution timing, all of which affect real trading outcomes. A fixed temporal holdout split is reported in methodology for transparency; thresholds are not retuned on the holdout window.
  2. The dataset covers Binance USD-M perpetual futures only. Results may not generalize to spot markets, other exchanges, or lower-liquidity assets with different microstructure.
  3. Confidence and recency filters were switched off while building the dataset, so figures reflect the detector’s raw geometric/RSI trigger rate — not the filtered, higher-conviction signals surfaced live to subscribers.
  4. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways labels use the first ±1.0× NATR threshold (or pattern-specific structural boundary) touched in candle order over the 20-candle forward horizon (target_first_hit / outcome_label). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open gap / nearer threshold from open, then candle body direction.
  5. Overlapping detections were deduplicated on formation start (longest span kept), but different pattern families can still fire on the same underlying move, so correlated market regimes (e.g. one broad rally) can inflate sample counts across several pattern types simultaneously.
  6. Spearman tables use Benjamini–Hochberg FDR q-values; stars also require |ρ| ≥ 0.05. Large samples can still make tiny associations look noteworthy without being economically meaningful. Primary correlations and lifts are within a single timeframe; multi-TF pooled tables are exploratory only.

Glossary

Bull flag / bullish flag
Common search names for the bullish flag chart pattern: a sharp advance (the pole) followed by a downward-sloping or rectangular consolidation. See the Bullish Flag pattern study for breakout statistics.
Head and shoulders pattern
A three-peak reversal pattern (left shoulder, head, right shoulder) with a neckline. Traders search this as “head and shoulders crypto” as well as the full name. See the Head and Shoulders study for exclusive breakdown rates.
Falling wedge bullish
A common query for the falling wedge: converging down-sloping trendlines often treated as a bullish continuation or reversal. See the Falling Wedge study.
Cup and handle pattern
A rounded-bottom continuation pattern with a shallow handle. Also searched as “cup and handle crypto”. See the Cup and Handle study for breakout rates.
Fuel gauge zones
Fixed partitions of Fuel component scores: Dead Water (0.00–0.33), Organic Flow (0.34–0.66), and The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00). Used for Fuel volume/momentum outcome charts on research pages.
NATR(14) & Formation Avg NATR
Normalized Average True Range over 14 periods — average candle range as a percentage of price. In this research, formation average NATR (natr_pattern_avg) is measured across the full pattern span to size breakout/breakdown thresholds (1.0× NATR) relative to market volatility rather than fixed percentages.
\[\mathrm{ATR}_{14}=\mathrm{AverageTrueRange}(H,L,C,14)\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{14}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ATR}_{14}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{\mathrm{avg}}=\dfrac{1}{N}\sum_{i=\mathrm{start}}^{\mathrm{end}}\mathrm{NATR}_{14,i}\]
Breakout / breakdown / sideways
Mutually exclusive outcome classes over the 20-candle forward horizon. Headline KPIs, ranks, and pattern-end geometry bins use breakout, breakdown, and sideways (sum to 100%). Breakout means the +1.0× NATR(14) upside threshold (or resistance trendline/neckline) is touched first; breakdown is the downside class; sideways on those samples means the pattern-end candle already tagged a line but neither ±1.0× NATR printed in the next 20 candles. Sideways is not a zero-move class: typical inside-band wick travel is the sideways ×NATR max-up / max-down. Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes.
\[\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Forming (trendline still inside)
Fourth exclusive class on trendline families (triangles, wedges, channels, flags, pennants) for snapshots that are not the last candle of the formation: price is still between the lines and neither side tagged in the next 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins report breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%. Non-trendline patterns have forming_rate 0.
\[\mathrm{Forming}\iff\text{still inside trendlines and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Both-cleared rate
Share of windows where both +1.0× and −1.0× NATR thresholds were cleared within the 20-candle forward horizon before the exclusive label was assigned. High both-cleared rates indicate volatile two-sided windows.
Expected-direction hit rate
For patterns with a directional bias (e.g. bullish patterns expect a breakout, bearish patterns expect a breakdown), this is the exclusive-class rate for that expected side only. Neutral patterns report breakout and breakdown separately.
Spearman ρ (rho)
A rank correlation coefficient between −1 and 1 that measures monotonic association without assuming a linear relationship or normal distribution — appropriate for skewed, fat-tailed return data. Tables emphasize pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features.
p-value, q-value & significance stars
Two-sided Spearman p-values are adjusted with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR (q-values). Stars require q < 0.05 and |ρ| ≥ 0.05 so large-n micro correlations are not marked significant. Always read stars with effect size.
Wilson 95% CI
Outcome rate fields ending in _ci95 are Wilson score intervals for the binomial point estimate. They quantify sampling uncertainty on rates, not trading risk or costs.
Null baseline / temporal holdout
Null baseline shuffles exclusive outcomes within each timeframe to show a chance expected-direction hit band. Temporal holdout compares rates before vs on/after a fixed cutoff (thresholds not retuned on holdout).
MFE / MAE
Maximum Favorable Excursion and Maximum Adverse Excursion — the best and worst price movement recorded within the forward horizon, expressed as a percentage of the snapshot close. MFE÷|MAE| summarizes average upside versus downside excursion magnitude.
\[\mathrm{MFE}=\mathrm{max\_up}_{20c}=\dfrac{\max(H_{t+1},\ldots,H_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{MAE}=\mathrm{max\_down}_{20c}=\dfrac{\min(L_{t+1},\ldots,L_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
Timeframe-specific feature bins
On each pattern study, feature distributions are computed separately for 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d. Use the timeframe control to switch; never treat pooled multi-TF histograms as interchangeable because candle horizons differ.
Feature quartile bins
Numeric features that are not Fuel, RSI, or σ-banded (e.g. slopes, current_scale_number, btc_dist14_mean) are split into quartiles. Each bin reports exclusive breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates plus mean MFE.
Feature typical / elevated bands
geom_width and head-and-shoulders symmetry use mean ± σ bands computed separately per pattern and timeframe: below typical (< μ−σ), typical (μ±σ), elevated (μ+σ to μ+2σ), and extreme (> μ+2σ). Pattern height and extension age use the same labels after a log1p transform so right-tailed size features are not dominated by outliers. Bins are never pooled across timeframes.
Pattern end (snapshot candle)
The single candle where features (RSI, Fuel, BTC context) and the forward 20-candle outcome window are measured. Trendline families use the last close still inside ±0.5× NATR of the projected channel; doubles/triples use a neckline re-touch within ±0.5× NATR; H&S uses the neckline break; cup & handle uses the rim touch after the handle; RSI divergences use the second price extreme. See Data & methodology for the full family list.
BTC regime (btc_dist14_median)
Terciles of BTC last-14 median distance at the live snapshot (btc_weak / btc_mid / btc_strong). Used as a simple proxy for BTC-relative market regime when slicing outcome rates (not in correlation ranks).
volume_score (Fuel volume)
Closed-candle volume vs a 20-period SMA, mapped to 0–1 with a small trend adjustment. Same Fuel Index volume component as the live gauge; open (forming) candle is not used.
\[\mathrm{volume\_ratio}=\dfrac{V_{t}}{\mathrm{SMA}(V,20)}\]
Piecewise base score from volume_ratio:
\[\mathrm{ratio}<0.8:\ \mathrm{base}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}}{0.8}\times 0.25\]
\[0.8\le\mathrm{ratio}\le 1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.3+\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-0.8}{0.7}\times 0.3\]
\[\mathrm{ratio}>1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.6+\min\!\bigl(1,\tfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-1.5}{1.5}\bigr)\times 0.4\]
\[\mathrm{trend\_adj}=\mathrm{clamp}(s_{V}\times 0.15,-0.05,+0.05)\]
\[\mathrm{volume\_score}=\mathrm{clamp}(\mathrm{base}+\mathrm{trend\_adj},\,0,\,1)\]
momentum_score (Fuel momentum)
Direction-agnostic energy score from RSI(14), 3-bar RSI change, and timeframe-specific ROC. Same Fuel Index momentum component as the live gauge.
\[\mathrm{ROC}=\dfrac{C_{t}-C_{t-N}}{C_{t-N}}\]
\[\Delta\mathrm{RSI}_{3}=\mathrm{RSI}_{t}-\mathrm{RSI}_{t-3}\]
ROC lookback N by timeframe: 15m→8, 1h→5, 4h→3, 1d→2.
\[\mathrm{momentum\_score}\in[0,1]\ \text{(RSI/ROC regime map)}\]
geom_height
Pattern height as a percentage of price at detection. Exact definition depends on pattern family (trendline channel vs double/triple vs cup vs H&S).
Trendline patterns (wedges / triangles / channels):
\[h_{\mathrm{start}}=R_{\mathrm{start}}-S_{\mathrm{start}}\]
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}=\dfrac{h_{\mathrm{start}}}{S_{\mathrm{start}}}\times 100\]
Double bottom / double top:
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}^{\mathrm{DB}}=\dfrac{N-\min(B_{1},B_{2})}{N}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}^{\mathrm{DT}}=\dfrac{\max(T_{1},T_{2})-N}{N}\times 100\]
Head & shoulders: absolute head-to-neckline height on the formation.
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}^{\mathrm{HS}}=\lvert h_{\mathrm{head}}\rvert\]
geom_width
Pattern duration in candles from formation start index to end index.
\[\mathrm{geom\_width}=i_{\mathrm{end}}-i_{\mathrm{start}}\]
geom_breakout_potential
Detector score of breakout likelihood from geometry. Definition is pattern-specific (e.g. cup depth for cup-and-handle; height/width/R² blend for H&S).
Cup & handle:
\[\mathrm{geom\_breakout\_potential}\approx\mathrm{cup\_depth}\]
Head & shoulders (clamped to [0, 1]):
\[\mathrm{geom\_breakout\_potential}=f\!\left(\tfrac{h_{\mathrm{head}}}{P_{\mathrm{head}}},\,w,\,R^{2}\right)\]
btc_dist14_mean
Mean of BTC last-14 percentage distances (feature_builder dist14_mean on BTC).
\[\delta_{i}=\dfrac{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t-i}-C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}\times 100,\quad i=1,\ldots,14\]
\[\mathrm{btc\_dist14\_mean}=\dfrac{1}{14}\sum_{i=1}^{14}\delta_{i}\]
current_scale_number
Position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout)
geom_cup_depth
Cup depth for cup-and-handle / inverted cup-and-handle (percent).
\[\mathrm{geom\_cup\_depth}=\dfrac{\lvert P_{\mathrm{rim}}-P_{\mathrm{trough}}\rvert}{P_{\mathrm{rim}}}\times 100\]
geom_cup_width
Cup width in candles for cup-and-handle formations.
\[\mathrm{geom\_cup\_width}=i_{\mathrm{right\,rim}}-i_{\mathrm{left\,rim}}\]
geom_handle_depth
Handle depth for cup-and-handle formations (percent).
\[\mathrm{geom\_handle\_depth}=\dfrac{\lvert P_{\mathrm{handle\,high}}-P_{\mathrm{handle\,low}}\rvert}{P_{\mathrm{ref}}}\times 100\]
geom_handle_width
Handle width in candles for cup-and-handle formations.
\[\mathrm{geom\_handle\_width}=i_{\mathrm{handle\,end}}-i_{\mathrm{handle\,start}}\]

Frequently asked questions

How to trade Cup & Handle using this crypto chart pattern study?

This page reports historical Cup & Handle breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates on Binance USD-M futures. Use the rates, typical travel, and timeframe tables as educational context — not a live trade signal.

Do Cup & Handle chart patterns work?

Cup & Handle was evaluated on 91 deduplicated snapshots across 88 Binance USD-M futures symbols. Exclusive outcomes below show how often the pattern broke out, broke down, or stayed sideways — not a guarantee that any single setup will follow the average.

What is the sample size for Cup & Handle?

Cup & Handle was evaluated on 91 deduplicated snapshots across 88 Binance USD-M futures symbols.

How is the pattern end candle chosen for Cup & Handle?

For Cup & Handle, pattern end is handle completion: the first rim-line touch within ±0.5× NATR(14) after the handle low — the pattern is “ready,” not yet past a full breakout. Outcomes are tracked across 20 forward bars.

Cup & Handle breakout rate: how often does Cup & Handle break out, break down, or go sideways?

Under a mutually exclusive ±1× NATR / 20-candle classification, breakout was 58.24%, breakdown 41.76%, and sideways 0.0%; expected-direction hit rate was 58.24%.

Which timeframe works best for Cup & Handle in this study?

Among timeframes present, 15m had the highest expected-direction hit rate at 75.0% (n=4).

What feature correlates most with Cup & Handle breakouts?

Within Cup & Handle only, the strongest Spearman correlate of breakout success was current_scale_number (ρ=0.2553, n=75). Effect sizes remain modest.

Is this financial advice?

No. These are educational historical statistics only. Past pattern outcomes do not guarantee future results.

Watch Cup & Handle live

ChartDatabase scans this pattern across 500+ Binance futures pairs with alerts.

How to cite this study

ChartDatabase Research Team (2026). “Cup & Handle: Breakout & Breakdown Statistics on Binance Futures (n=91).” In What Actually Drives Crypto Chart Pattern Breakouts? ChartDatabase. https://chartdatabase.com/research/cup_and_handle/