Skip to main content

Research · Pattern studies · Head & Shoulders

ChartDatabase Research · Chart pattern study

Head & Shoulders Pattern

Timeframe

1h timeframe — 7489 snapshots across 649 Binance USDT‑M futures markets — bearish bias. Results are not mixed with other candle intervals.

Abstract

Head & Shoulders statistics on the 1h timeframe only (n=7489). Timeframes are analyzed separately and never pooled — 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d horizons are not interchangeable. Use the timeframe control under the title to switch. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways: 25.16% / 74.04% / 0.8%.

Keywords Head & Shoulders patternHead & Shoulders breakoutHead & Shoulders cryptohow to trade Head & ShouldersHead & Shoulders success ratehead and shoulders patternhead and shoulders cryptocrypto chart patternschart pattern success rate

Key results (1h only)

Key findings
  1. Head & Shoulders on 1h: n=7,489 snapshots across 649 coins — breakout 25.16%, breakdown 74.04%, sideways 0.8% (exclusive classes; not pooled with other timeframes).
  2. Expected-direction (bearish) hit rate on 1h: 74.04%.
  3. Mean max-up / max-down on 1h: 4.094% / -4.205% (MFE÷|MAE| ≈ 0.974); median 20-candle close return -0.103%.
Snapshots
7489
Coins
649unique symbols
Hit rate
74.04%expected direction
Breakout
25.16%exclusive
Breakdown
74.04%exclusive
Sideways
0.8%neither
Median ret.
-0.103%
MFE ÷ |MAE|
0.974

Scope for this pattern

  • Exchange / market: Binance USD-M Futures (perpetual contracts).
  • Pattern end: For Head & Shoulders, pattern end is the neckline break confirmation candle. All features and the next-20-candle study window begin at that bar, measuring downside continuation (−1.0× NATR from neckline) vs invalidation.
  • Active timeframe: 1h only — other intervals (15m, 1h, 4h, 1d) are available via the control under the title and are never mixed into these figures.
  • Outcome horizon: next 20 candles on the selected timeframe. Headline KPIs use pattern-end snapshots: mutually exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). Fuel and RSI bins on trendline families also report Forming (still inside the lines).

Results (1h)

Return distribution

All figures below are for Head & Shoulders on the 1h timeframe only (n=7489). Timeframes are never pooled — a 15m candle horizon is not comparable to 1d. Mean return 0.015%, median -0.103%; exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways 25.16% / 74.04% / 0.8%. Mean MFE / MAE 4.094% / -4.205%.

Figure 1. 20-candle close return (%) for Head & Shoulders on 1h, clipped to ±16%.

Wick max-up / max-down over the same 20-candle window, expressed as NATR multiples. Sideways is not a spike at 0.

Figure 1b. 20-candle wick max-up (×NATR) on 1h.

Figure 1c. 20-candle wick max-down (×NATR).

Distribution statistics

  • Mean return: 0.015%
  • Median: -0.103% (P25 -2.738 · P75 2.496)
  • Std. deviation: 5.526%
  • Win rate (ret > 0): 48.71%
  • Mean MFE / MAE: 4.094% / -4.205%
  • Median max-up / max-down (×NATR): 1.699 / -1.892
  • Sideways rate: 0.8% (pattern-end unresolved; not a zero-move class; see ×NATR histograms)
  • Both-cleared (pre-label): 43.0%

Fuel volume & momentum scores

Fuel volume and momentum scores below use only Head & Shoulders snapshots on 1h. Zones match the live Fuel gauge (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg); each zone reports mean max-up / max-down over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

volume_score (n=7489; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 33.99% in Dead Water (0.00–0.33) to 10.90% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a substantial difference of -23.09 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 64.85% to 88.82% (+23.97 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.16% to 0.28% (-0.88 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 64.85% in Dead Water to 88.82% in The Powder Keg (+23.97 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in The Powder Keg (4.193%), compared with 4.091% in Dead Water and 4.193% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 12% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Dead Water0.00–0.33
n=2942
BO 33.99% BD 64.85% SW 1.16% FM 0.0%
Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=2740
BO 25.07% BD 74.16% SW 0.77% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=1807
BO 10.9% BD 88.82% SW 0.28% FM 0.0%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by Fuel volume score.

Empirical density of volume score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel volume score.

volume_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Dead Water 0.00–0.33 2942 4.091 -4.167 33.99 64.85 1.16 0.0
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 2740 4.031 -4.035 25.07 74.16 0.77 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 1807 4.193 -4.523 10.9 88.82 0.28 0.0

momentum_score (n=7489; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 29.99% in Organic Flow (0.34–0.66) to 16.33% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a substantial difference of -13.66 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 69.00% to 83.25% (+14.25 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.01% to 0.42% (-0.59 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 69.00% in Organic Flow to 83.25% in The Powder Keg (+14.25 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in The Powder Keg (4.387%), compared with 3.934% in Organic Flow and 4.387% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 26% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=4838
BO 29.99% BD 69.0% SW 1.01% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=2651
BO 16.33% BD 83.25% SW 0.42% FM 0.0%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by Fuel momentum score.

Empirical density of momentum score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel momentum score.

momentum_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 4838 3.934 -3.976 29.99 69.0 1.01 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 2651 4.387 -4.622 16.33 83.25 0.42 0.0

Feature distributions vs max-up / max-down

Feature bins below use only Head & Shoulders snapshots on 1h. Each bin reports mean max-up (MFE) and mean max-down (MAE) over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

rsi_14 (n=7489; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 7.20% in the lowest quartile (10–30; 10–30) to 32.01% in the highest (50–70; 50–70), a substantial difference of +24.81 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 92.80% to 66.48% (-26.32 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.00% to 1.51% (+1.51 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 92.80% in 10–30 to 66.48% in 50–70 (-26.32 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in 10–30 (4.406%), compared with 4.406% in 10–30 and 4.066% in 50–70. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 12% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot alone does not isolate a trading rule.

10–30
n=264
BO 7.2% BD 92.8% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%
30–50
n=6494
BO 25.12% BD 74.13% SW 0.75% FM 0.0%
50–70
n=731
BO 32.01% BD 66.48% SW 1.51% FM 0.0%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by rsi 14.

The histogram shows the empirical density of rsi 14 for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot.

rsi_14 bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
10–30 10–30 264 4.406 -5.843 7.2 92.8 0.0 0.0
30–50 30–50 6494 4.084 -4.154 25.12 74.13 0.75 0.0
50–70 50–70 731 4.066 -4.06 32.01 66.48 1.51 0.0

geom_height (n=7489; last snapshot per formation)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded pattern height (price span of the formation) are partitioned into log-transformed mean ± σ bands (below typical / typical / elevated / extreme). Exclusive breakout rates run from 25.14% in Typical (-0.409 – 1.79) to 24.52% in Extreme (5.05 – 2.54e+03), a negligible difference of -0.62 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 74.13% to 73.87% (-0.26 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.73% to 1.61% (+0.88 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 74.13% in Typical to 73.87% in Extreme (-0.26 percentage points; negligible shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Elevated (4.337%), compared with 4.104% in Typical and 3.722% in Extreme. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower pattern height readings (peak bin ≈ 95% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on pattern height (price span of the formation) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Typical-0.409 – 1.79
n=6976
BO 25.14% BD 74.13% SW 0.73%
Elevated1.79 – 5.05
n=203
BO 26.6% BD 71.43% SW 1.97%
Extreme5.05 – 2.54e+03
n=310
BO 24.52% BD 73.87% SW 1.61%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by height.

The histogram shows the empirical density of height for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of pattern height.

geom_height bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Typical -0.409 – 1.79 6976 4.104 -4.201 25.14 74.13 0.73
Elevated 1.79 – 5.05 203 4.337 -4.535 26.6 71.43 1.97
Extreme 5.05 – 2.54e+03 310 3.722 -4.061 24.52 73.87 1.61

geom_width (n=7489; last snapshot per formation)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded pattern width (duration in candles) are partitioned into mean ± σ bands (below typical / typical / elevated / extreme). Exclusive breakout rates run from 26.80% in Below typical (14 – 24.8) to 26.49% in Extreme (51.7 – 88), a negligible difference of -0.31 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 72.33% to 72.52% (+0.19 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.87% to 0.99% (+0.12 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 72.33% in Below typical to 72.52% in Extreme (+0.19 percentage points; negligible shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Below typical (4.242%), compared with 4.242% in Below typical and 4.062% in Extreme. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 14% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on pattern width (duration in candles) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Below typical14 – 24.8
n=1041
BO 26.8% BD 72.33% SW 0.87%
Typical24.8 – 42.7
n=5314
BO 25.05% BD 74.14% SW 0.81%
Elevated42.7 – 51.7
n=832
BO 23.32% BD 76.08% SW 0.6%
Extreme51.7 – 88
n=302
BO 26.49% BD 72.52% SW 0.99%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by width.

The histogram shows the empirical density of width for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of pattern width.

geom_width bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Below typical 14 – 24.8 1041 4.242 -4.043 26.8 72.33 0.87
Typical 24.8 – 42.7 5314 4.11 -4.146 25.05 74.14 0.81
Elevated 42.7 – 51.7 832 3.816 -4.755 23.32 76.08 0.6
Extreme 51.7 – 88 302 4.062 -4.282 26.49 72.52 0.99

geom_breakout_potential (n=7489; last snapshot per formation)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded breakout-potential score from pattern geometry are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 23.12% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 0.299 – 0.6) to 26.73% in the highest (Q4; 0.8 – 1), a material difference of +3.61 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 76.35% to 71.36% (-4.99 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.53% to 1.91% (+1.38 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 76.35% in Q1 to 71.36% in Q4 (-4.99 percentage points; material shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (5.443%), compared with 3.518% in Q1 and 5.443% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 27% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on breakout-potential score from pattern geometry alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q10.299 – 0.6
n=3002
BO 23.12% BD 76.35% SW 0.53%
Q20.6 – 0.7
n=2027
BO 25.36% BD 73.9% SW 0.74%
Q30.7 – 0.8
n=1622
BO 27.87% BD 71.33% SW 0.8%
Q40.8 – 1
n=838
BO 26.73% BD 71.36% SW 1.91%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by breakout potential.

The histogram shows the empirical density of breakout potential for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of breakout-potential score from pattern geometry.

geom_breakout_potential bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 0.299 – 0.6 3002 3.518 -3.678 23.12 76.35 0.53
Q2 0.6 – 0.7 2027 4.142 -4.281 25.36 73.9 0.74
Q3 0.7 – 0.8 1622 4.404 -4.639 27.87 71.33 0.8
Q4 0.8 – 1 838 5.443 -5.066 26.73 71.36 1.91

geom_support_slope (n=7489; last snapshot per formation)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded slope of the support line bounding the pattern are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 21.41% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -57.2 – -6.96e-05) to 26.44% in the highest (Q4; 0.000232 – 56.5), a substantial difference of +5.03 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 78.32% to 72.06% (-6.26 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.27% to 1.50% (+1.23 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 78.32% in Q1 to 72.06% in Q4 (-6.26 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q1 (4.366%), compared with 4.366% in Q1 and 4.194% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 92% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on slope of the support line bounding the pattern alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-57.2 – -6.96e-05
n=1873
BO 21.41% BD 78.32% SW 0.27%
Q2-6.96e-05 – 5e-06
n=1874
BO 24.81% BD 74.65% SW 0.54%
Q35e-06 – 0.000232
n=1870
BO 27.97% BD 71.12% SW 0.91%
Q40.000232 – 56.5
n=1872
BO 26.44% BD 72.06% SW 1.5%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by support slope.

The histogram shows the empirical density of support slope for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of slope of the support line bounding the pattern.

geom_support_slope bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 -57.2 – -6.96e-05 1873 4.366 -4.492 21.41 78.32 0.27
Q2 -6.96e-05 – 5e-06 1874 3.816 -3.899 24.81 74.65 0.54
Q3 5e-06 – 0.000232 1870 3.999 -3.983 27.97 71.12 0.91
Q4 0.000232 – 56.5 1872 4.194 -4.444 26.44 72.06 1.5

btc_dist14_mean (n=7489; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded BTC last-14 mean distance are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 30.01% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -7.73 – -0.0268) to 20.14% in the highest (Q4; 0.954 – 15.6), a substantial difference of -9.87 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 68.71% to 79.11% (+10.40 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.28% to 0.75% (-0.53 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 68.71% in Q1 to 79.11% in Q4 (+10.40 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (4.689%), compared with 4.244% in Q1 and 4.689% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 23% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on BTC last-14 mean distance alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-7.73 – -0.0268
n=1873
BO 30.01% BD 68.71% SW 1.28% FM 0.0%
Q2-0.0268 – 0.382
n=1874
BO 25.4% BD 74.07% SW 0.53% FM 0.0%
Q30.382 – 0.954
n=1870
BO 25.08% BD 74.28% SW 0.64% FM 0.0%
Q40.954 – 15.6
n=1872
BO 20.14% BD 79.11% SW 0.75% FM 0.0%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by btc mean.

The histogram shows the empirical density of btc mean for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of BTC last-14 mean distance.

btc_dist14_mean bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Q1 -7.73 – -0.0268 1873 4.244 -4.278 30.01 68.71 1.28 0.0
Q2 -0.0268 – 0.382 1874 3.453 -3.795 25.4 74.07 0.53 0.0
Q3 0.382 – 0.954 1870 3.991 -4.039 25.08 74.28 0.64 0.0
Q4 0.954 – 15.6 1872 4.689 -4.707 20.14 79.11 0.75 0.0

current_scale_number (n=7489; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout) are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 9.29% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -53 – -0.273) to 39.90% in the highest (Q4; -0.0469 – 0), a substantial difference of +30.61 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 90.44% to 59.08% (-31.36 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.27% to 1.02% (+0.75 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 90.44% in Q1 to 59.08% in Q4 (-31.36 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q3 (4.192%), compared with 4.148% in Q1 and 3.975% in Q4. The value histogram piles up toward higher readings (peak bin ≈ 44% of mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-53 – -0.273
n=1873
BO 9.29% BD 90.44% SW 0.27% FM 0.0%
Q2-0.273 – -0.122
n=1872
BO 19.71% BD 79.7% SW 0.59% FM 0.0%
Q3-0.122 – -0.0469
n=1872
BO 31.73% BD 66.93% SW 1.34% FM 0.0%
Q4-0.0469 – 0
n=1872
BO 39.9% BD 59.08% SW 1.02% FM 0.0%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by Pattern scale.

The histogram shows the empirical density of Pattern scale for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of position in the live channel.

current_scale_number bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Q1 -53 – -0.273 1873 4.148 -4.166 9.29 90.44 0.27 0.0
Q2 -0.273 – -0.122 1872 4.062 -4.304 19.71 79.7 0.59 0.0
Q3 -0.122 – -0.0469 1872 4.192 -4.251 31.73 66.93 1.34 0.0
Q4 -0.0469 – 0 1872 3.975 -4.098 39.9 59.08 1.02 0.0

geom_hs_completion_score (n=7489; last snapshot per formation)

Within Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,489 snapshots with recorded head-and-shoulders completion score are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 25.08% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 0.199 – 0.85) to 25.47% in the highest (Q3; 0.9 – 1), a negligible difference of +0.39 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 74.34% to 73.40% (-0.94 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.58% to 1.13% (+0.55 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 74.34% in Q1 to 73.40% in Q3 (-0.94 percentage points; negligible shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q3 (4.610%), compared with 3.288% in Q1 and 4.610% in Q3. The value histogram piles up toward higher readings (peak bin ≈ 44% of mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on head-and-shoulders completion score alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q10.199 – 0.85
n=1890
BO 25.08% BD 74.34% SW 0.58%
Q20.85 – 0.9
n=2332
BO 24.79% BD 74.7% SW 0.51%
Q30.9 – 1
n=3267
BO 25.47% BD 73.4% SW 1.13%

Head & Shoulders outcomes by hs completion score.

The histogram shows the empirical density of hs completion score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of head-and-shoulders completion score.

geom_hs_completion_score bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 0.199 – 0.85 1890 3.288 -3.312 25.08 74.34 0.58
Q2 0.85 – 0.9 2332 4.025 -4.144 24.79 74.7 0.51
Q3 0.9 – 1 3267 4.61 -4.764 25.47 73.4 1.13

Timeframe comparison

Side-by-side comparison across timeframes for Head & Shoulders. Each column is an independent sample — use it to contrast horizons, not as a pooled average.

Table. Head & Shoulders comparative outcomes by timeframe.
TF n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ ↑/|↓| Hit % BO % BD % SW %
15m 2729 1.981 -1.824 1.086 69.18 29.79 69.18 1.03
1h 7489 4.094 -4.205 0.974 74.04 25.16 74.04 0.8
4h 2068 9.169 -9.268 0.989 74.18 24.13 74.18 1.69
1d 310 32.867 -20.025 1.641 72.26 26.13 72.26 1.61

Feature correlations

Within Head & Shoulders on 1h, the strongest absolute Spearman correlate of breakout is current_scale_number (ρ = 0.2739***). Ranks use pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features. * p<0.05 · ** p<0.01 · *** p<0.001.

vs Breakout success

Table 1. Top breakout correlates.
Featureρpn
current_scale_number *** 0.2739 0.0 7489
volume_score *** -0.21 0.0 7489
momentum_score *** -0.1653 0.0 7489
rsi_14 *** 0.1569 0.0 7489
btc_dist14_mean *** -0.0799 0.0 7489
geom_support_slope *** 0.0501 0.000014 7489
geom_breakout_potential 0.0416 0.000319 7489
geom_height -0.0249 0.030908 7489
geom_hs_symmetry_score -0.0141 0.223175 7489
geom_width -0.0135 0.24341 7489
geom_hs_completion_score 0.006 0.60267 7489

vs Breakdown success

Table 2. Top breakdown correlates.
Featureρpn
current_scale_number *** -0.278 0.0 7489
volume_score *** 0.2163 0.0 7489
momentum_score *** 0.1701 0.0 7489
rsi_14 *** -0.1661 0.0 7489
btc_dist14_mean *** 0.0824 0.0 7489
geom_support_slope *** -0.061 0.0 7489
geom_breakout_potential -0.0477 0.000037 7489
geom_height 0.0187 0.105884 7489
geom_hs_symmetry_score 0.0182 0.114622 7489
geom_hs_completion_score -0.0119 0.302751 7489
geom_width 0.0104 0.367825 7489
Table 3. Top correlates of 20-candle close return.
Featureρpn
btc_dist14_mean *** 0.0631 0.0 7489
rsi_14 -0.0429 0.000202 7489
geom_support_slope -0.0429 0.000206 7489
momentum_score 0.0355 0.002147 7489
volume_score 0.0242 0.03615 7489
geom_height 0.0239 0.038368 7489
geom_width -0.0238 0.039786 7489
current_scale_number -0.0202 0.079976 7489
geom_hs_symmetry_score 0.0137 0.236853 7489
geom_hs_completion_score -0.011 0.34277 7489
geom_breakout_potential -0.0069 0.550644 7489
Table 3b. Top correlates of 20-candle max-up (MFE).
Featureρpn
momentum_score *** 0.1464 0.0 7489
geom_breakout_potential *** 0.1436 0.0 7489
geom_hs_completion_score *** 0.1428 0.0 7489
btc_dist14_mean *** 0.0837 0.0 7489
geom_height *** 0.055 0.000002 7489
rsi_14 *** -0.0526 0.000005 7489
geom_support_slope -0.0355 0.002121 7489
geom_hs_symmetry_score 0.0208 0.071912 7489
geom_width 0.0167 0.149059 7489
current_scale_number -0.0132 0.254402 7489
volume_score 0.0121 0.295599 7489
Table 3c. Top correlates of 20-candle max-down (MAE).
Featureρpn
geom_hs_completion_score *** -0.1574 0.0 7489
geom_breakout_potential *** -0.1414 0.0 7489
momentum_score *** -0.0961 0.0 7489
geom_height -0.0497 0.000017 7489
geom_width -0.036 0.001857 7489
geom_support_slope -0.018 0.118574 7489
current_scale_number -0.0122 0.292349 7489
btc_dist14_mean -0.0062 0.59011 7489
geom_hs_symmetry_score 0.0055 0.633018 7489
rsi_14 0.004 0.731848 7489
volume_score -0.0017 0.881901 7489

Outcome mix by timeframe

Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways rates by candle timeframe (hover for exact values).

Figure 2. Stacked exclusive outcome rates by timeframe.

Timeframe breakdown

Table 6. Head & Shoulders split by timeframe.
TF n Coins Hit % BO % BD % SW % Med % Mean %
15m 2729 549 69.18 29.79 69.18 1.03 0.051 0.068
1h 7489 649 74.04 25.16 74.04 0.8 -0.103 0.015
4h 2068 530 74.18 24.13 74.18 1.69 -0.791 -0.109
1d 310 219 72.26 26.13 72.26 1.61 -3.466 5.921

Methods note

Shared methodology (expand)

Pattern end for this study: For Head & Shoulders, pattern end is the neckline break confirmation candle. All features and the next-20-candle study window begin at that bar, measuring downside continuation (−1.0× NATR from neckline) vs invalidation.

Outcomes use mutually exclusive classes over the next 20 candles. Headline KPIs and geometry bins are pattern-end: breakout, breakdown, or sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). On trendline families, Fuel / RSI bins add Forming (still inside the lines). Correlations are Spearman with two-sided p-values. See the research hub methods for universe, how every pattern family defines pattern end, dedupe keys, and limitations.

Exclusive class: upside clears +1× natr_14 within 20 candles before downside.
Exclusive class: downside clears −1× natr_14 within 20 candles before upside.
Pattern-end (terminal) unresolved class: neither +1× nor −1× natr_14 cleared within 20 candles after the breached candle. Headline KPIs, ranks, and geometry bins use this sample; Forming is not in that formula. Sideways is not a zero-move class; typical wick travel inside the bands is reported as ×NATR max-up / max-down.
Trendline families only, and only on non-terminal snapshots still inside the lines: neither side tagged within 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins add Forming so four exclusive classes sum to 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%.
$$\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}$$

Labels use ground-truth path outcomes (outcome_label / target_first_hit from full kline OHLC path). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Unresolved non-terminal trendline snapshots are Forming; unresolved terminal snapshots are Sideways. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open proximity, then candle body polarity, then return sign. Pattern-end headline rates: breakout + breakdown + sideways = 100%. Forming+terminal Fuel/RSI bins: breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%.

Limitations & disclosures

  1. This is a historical, in-sample statistical study — not a forward-tested trading strategy. It excludes exchange fees, funding rates, slippage, and execution timing, all of which affect real trading outcomes. A fixed temporal holdout split is reported in methodology for transparency; thresholds are not retuned on the holdout window.
  2. The dataset covers Binance USD-M perpetual futures only. Results may not generalize to spot markets, other exchanges, or lower-liquidity assets with different microstructure.
  3. Confidence and recency filters were switched off while building the dataset, so figures reflect the detector’s raw geometric/RSI trigger rate — not the filtered, higher-conviction signals surfaced live to subscribers.
  4. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways labels use the first ±1.0× NATR threshold (or pattern-specific structural boundary) touched in candle order over the 20-candle forward horizon (target_first_hit / outcome_label). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open gap / nearer threshold from open, then candle body direction.
  5. Overlapping detections were deduplicated on formation start (longest span kept), but different pattern families can still fire on the same underlying move, so correlated market regimes (e.g. one broad rally) can inflate sample counts across several pattern types simultaneously.
  6. Spearman tables use Benjamini–Hochberg FDR q-values; stars also require |ρ| ≥ 0.05. Large samples can still make tiny associations look noteworthy without being economically meaningful. Primary correlations and lifts are within a single timeframe; multi-TF pooled tables are exploratory only.

Glossary

Bull flag / bullish flag
Common search names for the bullish flag chart pattern: a sharp advance (the pole) followed by a downward-sloping or rectangular consolidation. See the Bullish Flag pattern study for breakout statistics.
Head and shoulders pattern
A three-peak reversal pattern (left shoulder, head, right shoulder) with a neckline. Traders search this as “head and shoulders crypto” as well as the full name. See the Head and Shoulders study for exclusive breakdown rates.
Falling wedge bullish
A common query for the falling wedge: converging down-sloping trendlines often treated as a bullish continuation or reversal. See the Falling Wedge study.
Cup and handle pattern
A rounded-bottom continuation pattern with a shallow handle. Also searched as “cup and handle crypto”. See the Cup and Handle study for breakout rates.
Fuel gauge zones
Fixed partitions of Fuel component scores: Dead Water (0.00–0.33), Organic Flow (0.34–0.66), and The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00). Used for Fuel volume/momentum outcome charts on research pages.
NATR(14) & Formation Avg NATR
Normalized Average True Range over 14 periods — average candle range as a percentage of price. In this research, formation average NATR (natr_pattern_avg) is measured across the full pattern span to size breakout/breakdown thresholds (1.0× NATR) relative to market volatility rather than fixed percentages.
\[\mathrm{ATR}_{14}=\mathrm{AverageTrueRange}(H,L,C,14)\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{14}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ATR}_{14}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{\mathrm{avg}}=\dfrac{1}{N}\sum_{i=\mathrm{start}}^{\mathrm{end}}\mathrm{NATR}_{14,i}\]
Breakout / breakdown / sideways
Mutually exclusive outcome classes over the 20-candle forward horizon. Headline KPIs, ranks, and pattern-end geometry bins use breakout, breakdown, and sideways (sum to 100%). Breakout means the +1.0× NATR(14) upside threshold (or resistance trendline/neckline) is touched first; breakdown is the downside class; sideways on those samples means the pattern-end candle already tagged a line but neither ±1.0× NATR printed in the next 20 candles. Sideways is not a zero-move class: typical inside-band wick travel is the sideways ×NATR max-up / max-down. Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes.
\[\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Forming (trendline still inside)
Fourth exclusive class on trendline families (triangles, wedges, channels, flags, pennants) for snapshots that are not the last candle of the formation: price is still between the lines and neither side tagged in the next 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins report breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%. Non-trendline patterns have forming_rate 0.
\[\mathrm{Forming}\iff\text{still inside trendlines and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Both-cleared rate
Share of windows where both +1.0× and −1.0× NATR thresholds were cleared within the 20-candle forward horizon before the exclusive label was assigned. High both-cleared rates indicate volatile two-sided windows.
Expected-direction hit rate
For patterns with a directional bias (e.g. bullish patterns expect a breakout, bearish patterns expect a breakdown), this is the exclusive-class rate for that expected side only. Neutral patterns report breakout and breakdown separately.
Spearman ρ (rho)
A rank correlation coefficient between −1 and 1 that measures monotonic association without assuming a linear relationship or normal distribution — appropriate for skewed, fat-tailed return data. Tables emphasize pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features.
p-value, q-value & significance stars
Two-sided Spearman p-values are adjusted with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR (q-values). Stars require q < 0.05 and |ρ| ≥ 0.05 so large-n micro correlations are not marked significant. Always read stars with effect size.
Wilson 95% CI
Outcome rate fields ending in _ci95 are Wilson score intervals for the binomial point estimate. They quantify sampling uncertainty on rates, not trading risk or costs.
Null baseline / temporal holdout
Null baseline shuffles exclusive outcomes within each timeframe to show a chance expected-direction hit band. Temporal holdout compares rates before vs on/after a fixed cutoff (thresholds not retuned on holdout).
MFE / MAE
Maximum Favorable Excursion and Maximum Adverse Excursion — the best and worst price movement recorded within the forward horizon, expressed as a percentage of the snapshot close. MFE÷|MAE| summarizes average upside versus downside excursion magnitude.
\[\mathrm{MFE}=\mathrm{max\_up}_{20c}=\dfrac{\max(H_{t+1},\ldots,H_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{MAE}=\mathrm{max\_down}_{20c}=\dfrac{\min(L_{t+1},\ldots,L_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
Timeframe-specific feature bins
On each pattern study, feature distributions are computed separately for 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d. Use the timeframe control to switch; never treat pooled multi-TF histograms as interchangeable because candle horizons differ.
Feature quartile bins
Numeric features that are not Fuel, RSI, or σ-banded (e.g. slopes, current_scale_number, btc_dist14_mean) are split into quartiles. Each bin reports exclusive breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates plus mean MFE.
Feature typical / elevated bands
geom_width and head-and-shoulders symmetry use mean ± σ bands computed separately per pattern and timeframe: below typical (< μ−σ), typical (μ±σ), elevated (μ+σ to μ+2σ), and extreme (> μ+2σ). Pattern height and extension age use the same labels after a log1p transform so right-tailed size features are not dominated by outliers. Bins are never pooled across timeframes.
Pattern end (snapshot candle)
The single candle where features (RSI, Fuel, BTC context) and the forward 20-candle outcome window are measured. Trendline families use the last close still inside ±0.5× NATR of the projected channel; doubles/triples use a neckline re-touch within ±0.5× NATR; H&S uses the neckline break; cup & handle uses the rim touch after the handle; RSI divergences use the second price extreme. See Data & methodology for the full family list.
BTC regime (btc_dist14_median)
Terciles of BTC last-14 median distance at the live snapshot (btc_weak / btc_mid / btc_strong). Used as a simple proxy for BTC-relative market regime when slicing outcome rates (not in correlation ranks).
volume_score (Fuel volume)
Closed-candle volume vs a 20-period SMA, mapped to 0–1 with a small trend adjustment. Same Fuel Index volume component as the live gauge; open (forming) candle is not used.
\[\mathrm{volume\_ratio}=\dfrac{V_{t}}{\mathrm{SMA}(V,20)}\]
Piecewise base score from volume_ratio:
\[\mathrm{ratio}<0.8:\ \mathrm{base}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}}{0.8}\times 0.25\]
\[0.8\le\mathrm{ratio}\le 1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.3+\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-0.8}{0.7}\times 0.3\]
\[\mathrm{ratio}>1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.6+\min\!\bigl(1,\tfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-1.5}{1.5}\bigr)\times 0.4\]
\[\mathrm{trend\_adj}=\mathrm{clamp}(s_{V}\times 0.15,-0.05,+0.05)\]
\[\mathrm{volume\_score}=\mathrm{clamp}(\mathrm{base}+\mathrm{trend\_adj},\,0,\,1)\]
momentum_score (Fuel momentum)
Direction-agnostic energy score from RSI(14), 3-bar RSI change, and timeframe-specific ROC. Same Fuel Index momentum component as the live gauge.
\[\mathrm{ROC}=\dfrac{C_{t}-C_{t-N}}{C_{t-N}}\]
\[\Delta\mathrm{RSI}_{3}=\mathrm{RSI}_{t}-\mathrm{RSI}_{t-3}\]
ROC lookback N by timeframe: 15m→8, 1h→5, 4h→3, 1d→2.
\[\mathrm{momentum\_score}\in[0,1]\ \text{(RSI/ROC regime map)}\]
rsi_14
14-period Relative Strength Index on the asset close at the live snapshot (forming + terminal; feature_builder: RSIIndicator(close, window=14)).
\[U_{t}=\max(C_{t}-C_{t-1},0),\quad D_{t}=\max(C_{t-1}-C_{t},0)\]
\[\mathrm{RS}=\dfrac{\mathrm{SMA}(U,14)}{\mathrm{SMA}(D,14)}\]
\[\mathrm{RSI}_{14}=100-\dfrac{100}{1+\mathrm{RS}}\]
geom_height
Pattern height as a percentage of price at detection. Exact definition depends on pattern family (trendline channel vs double/triple vs cup vs H&S).
Trendline patterns (wedges / triangles / channels):
\[h_{\mathrm{start}}=R_{\mathrm{start}}-S_{\mathrm{start}}\]
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}=\dfrac{h_{\mathrm{start}}}{S_{\mathrm{start}}}\times 100\]
Double bottom / double top:
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}^{\mathrm{DB}}=\dfrac{N-\min(B_{1},B_{2})}{N}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}^{\mathrm{DT}}=\dfrac{\max(T_{1},T_{2})-N}{N}\times 100\]
Head & shoulders: absolute head-to-neckline height on the formation.
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}^{\mathrm{HS}}=\lvert h_{\mathrm{head}}\rvert\]
geom_width
Pattern duration in candles from formation start index to end index.
\[\mathrm{geom\_width}=i_{\mathrm{end}}-i_{\mathrm{start}}\]
geom_breakout_potential
Detector score of breakout likelihood from geometry. Definition is pattern-specific (e.g. cup depth for cup-and-handle; height/width/R² blend for H&S).
Cup & handle:
\[\mathrm{geom\_breakout\_potential}\approx\mathrm{cup\_depth}\]
Head & shoulders (clamped to [0, 1]):
\[\mathrm{geom\_breakout\_potential}=f\!\left(\tfrac{h_{\mathrm{head}}}{P_{\mathrm{head}}},\,w,\,R^{2}\right)\]
geom_support_slope
Slope of the fitted support / lower trendline, expressed as percent price change per candle.
Fit through support pivots:
\[P\approx a+b\,i\]
\[\mathrm{geom\_support\_slope}=b_{\%/c}\]
btc_dist14_mean
Mean of BTC last-14 percentage distances (feature_builder dist14_mean on BTC).
\[\delta_{i}=\dfrac{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t-i}-C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}\times 100,\quad i=1,\ldots,14\]
\[\mathrm{btc\_dist14\_mean}=\dfrac{1}{14}\sum_{i=1}^{14}\delta_{i}\]
current_scale_number
Position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout)
geom_hs_completion_score
Head-and-shoulders completion / quality score from the detector.
\[\mathrm{geom\_hs\_completion\_score}\in[0,1]\]
geom_hs_symmetry_score
Head-and-shoulders left/right shoulder symmetry score from the detector.
\[\mathrm{geom\_hs\_symmetry\_score}\in[0,1]\]

Frequently asked questions

How to trade Head & Shoulders using this crypto chart pattern study?

This page reports historical Head & Shoulders breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates on Binance USD-M futures. Use the rates, typical travel, and timeframe tables as educational context — not a live trade signal.

Do Head & Shoulders chart patterns work?

Head & Shoulders was evaluated on 12,596 deduplicated snapshots across 664 Binance USD-M futures symbols. Exclusive outcomes below show how often the pattern broke out, broke down, or stayed sideways — not a guarantee that any single setup will follow the average.

What is the sample size for Head & Shoulders?

Head & Shoulders was evaluated on 12,596 deduplicated snapshots across 664 Binance USD-M futures symbols.

How is the pattern end candle chosen for Head & Shoulders?

For Head & Shoulders, pattern end is the neckline break confirmation candle. All features and the next-20-candle study window begin at that bar, measuring downside continuation (−1.0× NATR from neckline) vs invalidation.

Head & Shoulders breakout rate: how often does Head & Shoulders break out, break down, or go sideways?

Under a mutually exclusive ±1× NATR / 20-candle classification, breakout was 26.02%, breakdown 72.97%, and sideways 1.01%; expected-direction hit rate was 72.97%.

Which timeframe works best for Head & Shoulders in this study?

Among timeframes present, 4h had the highest expected-direction hit rate at 74.18% (n=2,068).

What feature correlates most with Head & Shoulders breakouts?

Within Head & Shoulders only, the strongest Spearman correlate of breakout success was current_scale_number (ρ=0.2739***, n=7,489). Effect sizes remain modest.

Is this financial advice?

No. These are educational historical statistics only. Past pattern outcomes do not guarantee future results.

Watch Head & Shoulders live

ChartDatabase scans this pattern across 500+ Binance futures pairs with alerts.

How to cite this study

ChartDatabase Research Team (2026). “Head & Shoulders: Breakout & Breakdown Statistics on Binance Futures (n=12,596).” In What Actually Drives Crypto Chart Pattern Breakouts? ChartDatabase. https://chartdatabase.com/research/head_and_shoulders/