Skip to main content

Research · Pattern studies · RSI Regular Bullish Divergence

ChartDatabase Research · Chart pattern study

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence Pattern

Timeframe

1h timeframe — 2444 snapshots across 572 Binance USDT‑M futures markets — bullish bias. Results are not mixed with other candle intervals.

Abstract

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence statistics on the 1h timeframe only (n=2444). Timeframes are analyzed separately and never pooled — 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d horizons are not interchangeable. Use the timeframe control under the title to switch. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways: 46.28% / 53.19% / 0.53%.

Keywords RSI Regular Bullish Divergence patternRSI Regular Bullish Divergence breakoutRSI Regular Bullish Divergence cryptohow to trade RSI Regular Bullish DivergenceRSI Regular Bullish Divergence success ratecrypto chart patternschart pattern success rate

Key results (1h only)

Key findings
  1. RSI Regular Bullish Divergence on 1h: n=2,444 snapshots across 572 coins — breakout 46.28%, breakdown 53.19%, sideways 0.53% (exclusive classes; not pooled with other timeframes).
  2. Expected-direction (bullish) hit rate on 1h: 46.28%.
  3. Mean max-up / max-down on 1h: 4.217% / -4.88% (MFE÷|MAE| ≈ 0.864); median 20-candle close return 0.032%.
Snapshots
2444
Coins
572unique symbols
Hit rate
46.28%expected direction
Breakout
46.28%exclusive
Breakdown
53.19%exclusive
Sideways
0.53%neither
Median ret.
0.032%
MFE ÷ |MAE|
0.864

Scope for this pattern

  • Exchange / market: Binance USD-M Futures (perpetual contracts).
  • Pattern end: For RSI Regular Bullish Divergence, pattern end is the second price extreme of the divergence. There is no trendline walk-forward; the snapshot is that second swing, evaluated over 20 forward candles vs ±1.0× NATR(14).
  • Active timeframe: 1h only — other intervals (15m, 1h, 4h, 1d) are available via the control under the title and are never mixed into these figures.
  • Outcome horizon: next 20 candles on the selected timeframe. Headline KPIs use pattern-end snapshots: mutually exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). Fuel and RSI bins on trendline families also report Forming (still inside the lines).

Results (1h)

Return distribution

All figures below are for RSI Regular Bullish Divergence on the 1h timeframe only (n=2444). Timeframes are never pooled — a 15m candle horizon is not comparable to 1d. Mean return -0.205%, median 0.032%; exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways 46.28% / 53.19% / 0.53%. Mean MFE / MAE 4.217% / -4.88%.

Figure 1. 20-candle close return (%) for RSI Regular Bullish Divergence on 1h, clipped to ±16%.

Wick max-up / max-down over the same 20-candle window, expressed as NATR multiples. Sideways is not a spike at 0.

Figure 1b. 20-candle wick max-up (×NATR) on 1h.

Figure 1c. 20-candle wick max-down (×NATR).

Distribution statistics

  • Mean return: -0.205%
  • Median: 0.032% (P25 -2.908 · P75 2.759)
  • Std. deviation: 6.41%
  • Win rate (ret > 0): 50.2%
  • Mean MFE / MAE: 4.217% / -4.88%
  • Median max-up / max-down (×NATR): 1.761 / -2.045
  • Sideways rate: 0.53% (pattern-end unresolved; not a zero-move class; see ×NATR histograms)
  • Both-cleared (pre-label): 43.82%

Fuel volume & momentum scores

Fuel volume and momentum scores below use only RSI Regular Bullish Divergence snapshots on 1h. Zones match the live Fuel gauge (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg); each zone reports mean max-up / max-down over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

volume_score (n=2444; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence (1h), 2,444 snapshots with recorded Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 44.07% in Dead Water (0.00–0.33) to 43.75% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a negligible difference of -0.32 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 54.89% to 56.09% (+1.20 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.04% to 0.16% (-0.88 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 44.07% in Dead Water to 43.75% in The Powder Keg (-0.32 percentage points; negligible shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in The Powder Keg (4.561%), compared with 3.837% in Dead Water and 4.561% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 11% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Dead Water0.00–0.33
n=869
BO 44.07% BD 54.89% SW 1.04% FM 0.0%
Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=967
BO 49.84% BD 49.84% SW 0.32% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=608
BO 43.75% BD 56.09% SW 0.16% FM 0.0%

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence outcomes by Fuel volume score.

Empirical density of volume score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel volume score.

volume_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Dead Water 0.00–0.33 869 3.837 -4.524 44.07 54.89 1.04 0.0
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 967 4.341 -4.678 49.84 49.84 0.32 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 608 4.561 -5.709 43.75 56.09 0.16 0.0

momentum_score (n=2444; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence (1h), 2,444 snapshots with recorded Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 43.17% in Organic Flow (0.34–0.66) to 47.37% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a material difference of +4.20 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 56.04% to 52.19% (-3.85 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.79% to 0.44% (-0.35 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 43.17% in Organic Flow to 47.37% in The Powder Keg (+4.20 percentage points; material shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in The Powder Keg (4.548%), compared with 3.275% in Organic Flow and 4.548% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 19% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=637
BO 43.17% BD 56.04% SW 0.79% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=1807
BO 47.37% BD 52.19% SW 0.44% FM 0.0%

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence outcomes by Fuel momentum score.

Empirical density of momentum score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel momentum score.

momentum_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 637 3.275 -3.874 43.17 56.04 0.79 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 1807 4.548 -5.234 47.37 52.19 0.44 0.0

Feature distributions vs max-up / max-down

Feature bins below use only RSI Regular Bullish Divergence snapshots on 1h. Each bin reports mean max-up (MFE) and mean max-down (MAE) over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

rsi_14 (n=2444; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence (1h), 2,444 snapshots with recorded 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 50.40% in the lowest quartile (10–30; 10–30) to 45.22% in the highest (30–50; 30–50), a substantial difference of -5.18 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 48.80% to 54.32% (+5.52 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.80% to 0.46% (-0.34 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 50.40% in 10–30 to 45.22% in 30–50 (-5.18 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in 10–30 (4.893%), compared with 4.893% in 10–30 and 4.043% in 30–50. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 12% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot alone does not isolate a trading rule.

10–30
n=498
BO 50.4% BD 48.8% SW 0.8% FM 0.0%
30–50
n=1946
BO 45.22% BD 54.32% SW 0.46% FM 0.0%

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence outcomes by rsi 14.

The histogram shows the empirical density of rsi 14 for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot.

rsi_14 bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
10–30 10–30 498 4.893 -5.45 50.4 48.8 0.8 0.0
30–50 30–50 1946 4.043 -4.734 45.22 54.32 0.46 0.0

rsi_div_span (n=2444; last snapshot per formation)

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence (1h), 2,444 snapshots with recorded candle span between the two price extremes are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 45.98% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 6 – 8) to 44.30% in the highest (Q4; 16 – 52), a modest difference of -1.68 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 53.60% to 55.21% (+1.61 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.42% to 0.49% (+0.07 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 45.98% in Q1 to 44.30% in Q4 (-1.68 percentage points; modest shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q2 (4.592%), compared with 4.326% in Q1 and 3.648% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower candle span between the two price extremes readings (peak bin ≈ 29% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on candle span between the two price extremes alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q16 – 8
n=709
BO 45.98% BD 53.6% SW 0.42%
Q28 – 11
n=560
BO 49.82% BD 49.46% SW 0.72%
Q311 – 16
n=570
BO 45.26% BD 54.21% SW 0.53%
Q416 – 52
n=605
BO 44.3% BD 55.21% SW 0.49%

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence outcomes by rsi div span.

The histogram shows the empirical density of rsi div span for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of candle span between the two price extremes.

rsi_div_span bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 6 – 8 709 4.326 -4.488 45.98 53.6 0.42
Q2 8 – 11 560 4.592 -4.516 49.82 49.46 0.72
Q3 11 – 16 570 4.315 -4.696 45.26 54.21 0.53
Q4 16 – 52 605 3.648 -5.849 44.3 55.21 0.49

rsi_div_price_divergence (n=2444; last snapshot per formation)

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence (1h), 2,444 snapshots with recorded signed price-leg divergence used in detector confidence are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 45.66% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -0.00094 – 0.00244) to 47.95% in the highest (Q4; 0.0134 – 0.325), a modest difference of +2.29 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 54.01% to 51.23% (-2.78 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.33% to 0.82% (+0.49 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 45.66% in Q1 to 47.95% in Q4 (+2.29 percentage points; modest shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (5.714%), compared with 3.464% in Q1 and 5.714% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower signed price-leg divergence used in detector confidence readings (peak bin ≈ 45% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on signed price-leg divergence used in detector confidence alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-0.00094 – 0.00244
n=611
BO 45.66% BD 54.01% SW 0.33%
Q20.00244 – 0.00611
n=611
BO 45.17% BD 54.17% SW 0.66%
Q30.00611 – 0.0134
n=611
BO 46.32% BD 53.36% SW 0.32%
Q40.0134 – 0.325
n=611
BO 47.95% BD 51.23% SW 0.82%

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence outcomes by rsi div price divergence.

The histogram shows the empirical density of rsi div price divergence for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of signed price-leg divergence used in detector confidence.

rsi_div_price_divergence bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 -0.00094 – 0.00244 611 3.464 -4.101 45.66 54.01 0.33
Q2 0.00244 – 0.00611 611 3.699 -4.1 45.17 54.17 0.66
Q3 0.00611 – 0.0134 611 3.989 -4.685 46.32 53.36 0.32
Q4 0.0134 – 0.325 611 5.714 -6.633 47.95 51.23 0.82

rsi_div_rsi_divergence (n=2444; last snapshot per formation)

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence (1h), 2,444 snapshots with recorded signed RSI-leg divergence used in detector confidence are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 42.72% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -0.00099 – 0.0139) to 44.03% in the highest (Q4; 0.0576 – 0.21), a modest difference of +1.31 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 56.79% to 55.48% (-1.31 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.49% to 0.49% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 42.72% in Q1 to 44.03% in Q4 (+1.31 percentage points; modest shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q2 (4.358%), compared with 4.109% in Q1 and 4.314% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower signed RSI-leg divergence used in detector confidence readings (peak bin ≈ 18% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on signed RSI-leg divergence used in detector confidence alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-0.00099 – 0.0139
n=611
BO 42.72% BD 56.79% SW 0.49%
Q20.0139 – 0.031
n=611
BO 49.75% BD 49.59% SW 0.66%
Q30.031 – 0.0576
n=611
BO 48.61% BD 50.9% SW 0.49%
Q40.0576 – 0.21
n=611
BO 44.03% BD 55.48% SW 0.49%

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence outcomes by rsi div rsi divergence.

The histogram shows the empirical density of rsi div rsi divergence for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of signed RSI-leg divergence used in detector confidence.

rsi_div_rsi_divergence bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 -0.00099 – 0.0139 611 4.109 -4.946 42.72 56.79 0.49
Q2 0.0139 – 0.031 611 4.358 -4.721 49.75 49.59 0.66
Q3 0.031 – 0.0576 611 4.086 -4.728 48.61 50.9 0.49
Q4 0.0576 – 0.21 611 4.314 -5.124 44.03 55.48 0.49

btc_dist14_mean (n=2444; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence (1h), 2,444 snapshots with recorded BTC last-14 mean distance are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 44.84% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -6.82 – 0.163) to 47.46% in the highest (Q4; 1.43 – 27.7), a material difference of +2.62 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 54.17% to 52.54% (-1.63 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.99% to 0.00% (-0.99 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 44.84% in Q1 to 47.46% in Q4 (+2.62 percentage points; material shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (5.693%), compared with 3.795% in Q1 and 5.693% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 23% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on BTC last-14 mean distance alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-6.82 – 0.163
n=611
BO 44.84% BD 54.17% SW 0.99% FM 0.0%
Q20.163 – 0.676
n=612
BO 45.1% BD 54.25% SW 0.65% FM 0.0%
Q30.676 – 1.43
n=610
BO 47.7% BD 51.8% SW 0.5% FM 0.0%
Q41.43 – 27.7
n=611
BO 47.46% BD 52.54% SW 0.0% FM 0.0%

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence outcomes by btc mean.

The histogram shows the empirical density of btc mean for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of BTC last-14 mean distance.

btc_dist14_mean bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Q1 -6.82 – 0.163 611 3.795 -4.753 44.84 54.17 0.99 0.0
Q2 0.163 – 0.676 612 3.746 -4.028 45.1 54.25 0.65 0.0
Q3 0.676 – 1.43 610 3.632 -4.415 47.7 51.8 0.5 0.0
Q4 1.43 – 27.7 611 5.693 -6.324 47.46 52.54 0.0 0.0

rsi_div_price_delta_pct (n=2444; last snapshot per formation)

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence (1h), 2,444 snapshots with recorded percent price change from first to second extreme are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 47.95% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -32.5 – -1.34) to 45.66% in the highest (Q4; -0.244 – -0.00598), a modest difference of -2.29 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 51.23% to 54.01% (+2.78 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.82% to 0.33% (-0.49 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 47.95% in Q1 to 45.66% in Q4 (-2.29 percentage points; modest shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q1 (5.714%), compared with 5.714% in Q1 and 3.464% in Q4. The value histogram piles up toward higher readings (peak bin ≈ 45% of mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on percent price change from first to second extreme alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-32.5 – -1.34
n=611
BO 47.95% BD 51.23% SW 0.82%
Q2-1.34 – -0.611
n=611
BO 46.32% BD 53.36% SW 0.32%
Q3-0.611 – -0.244
n=611
BO 45.17% BD 54.17% SW 0.66%
Q4-0.244 – -0.00598
n=611
BO 45.66% BD 54.01% SW 0.33%

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence outcomes by rsi div price delta pct.

The histogram shows the empirical density of rsi div price delta pct for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of percent price change from first to second extreme.

rsi_div_price_delta_pct bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 -32.5 – -1.34 611 5.714 -6.633 47.95 51.23 0.82
Q2 -1.34 – -0.611 611 3.989 -4.685 46.32 53.36 0.32
Q3 -0.611 – -0.244 611 3.699 -4.1 45.17 54.17 0.66
Q4 -0.244 – -0.00598 611 3.464 -4.101 45.66 54.01 0.33

rsi_div_rsi_delta (n=2444; last snapshot per formation)

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence (1h), 2,444 snapshots with recorded RSI-point change from first to second extreme are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 42.72% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -2.1e-05 – 1.39) to 44.03% in the highest (Q4; 5.76 – 21), a modest difference of +1.31 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 56.79% to 55.48% (-1.31 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.49% to 0.49% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 42.72% in Q1 to 44.03% in Q4 (+1.31 percentage points; modest shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q2 (4.358%), compared with 4.109% in Q1 and 4.314% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower RSI-point change from first to second extreme readings (peak bin ≈ 18% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on RSI-point change from first to second extreme alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-2.1e-05 – 1.39
n=611
BO 42.72% BD 56.79% SW 0.49%
Q21.39 – 3.1
n=611
BO 49.75% BD 49.59% SW 0.66%
Q33.1 – 5.76
n=611
BO 48.61% BD 50.9% SW 0.49%
Q45.76 – 21
n=611
BO 44.03% BD 55.48% SW 0.49%

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence outcomes by rsi div rsi delta.

The histogram shows the empirical density of rsi div rsi delta for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of RSI-point change from first to second extreme.

rsi_div_rsi_delta bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 -2.1e-05 – 1.39 611 4.109 -4.946 42.72 56.79 0.49
Q2 1.39 – 3.1 611 4.358 -4.721 49.75 49.59 0.66
Q3 3.1 – 5.76 611 4.086 -4.728 48.61 50.9 0.49
Q4 5.76 – 21 611 4.314 -5.124 44.03 55.48 0.49

Timeframe comparison

Side-by-side comparison across timeframes for RSI Regular Bullish Divergence. Each column is an independent sample — use it to contrast horizons, not as a pooled average.

Table. RSI Regular Bullish Divergence comparative outcomes by timeframe.
TF n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ ↑/|↓| Hit % BO % BD % SW %
15m 633 2.079 -1.907 1.09 48.34 48.34 51.03 0.63
1h 2444 4.217 -4.88 0.864 46.28 46.28 53.19 0.53
4h 735 9.487 -9.526 0.996 47.62 47.62 52.11 0.27
1d 178 22.358 -19.765 1.131 47.75 47.75 50.0 2.25

Feature correlations

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence on 1h, the strongest absolute Spearman correlate of breakout is momentum_score (ρ = 0.041). Ranks use pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features. * p<0.05 · ** p<0.01 · *** p<0.001.

vs Breakout success

Table 1. Top breakout correlates.
Featureρpn
momentum_score 0.041 0.042667 2444
btc_dist14_mean 0.0323 0.109918 2444
rsi_14 -0.0269 0.18428 2444
rsi_div_price_delta_pct -0.0256 0.206288 2444
rsi_div_price_divergence 0.0256 0.206288 2444
rsi_div_span -0.0176 0.385768 2444
rsi_div_rsi_delta 0.0119 0.556272 2444
rsi_div_rsi_divergence 0.0119 0.556272 2444
volume_score 0.0062 0.759244 2444

vs Breakdown success

Table 2. Top breakdown correlates.
Featureρpn
momentum_score -0.039 0.054012 2444
rsi_14 0.0303 0.13372 2444
rsi_div_price_delta_pct 0.027 0.182729 2444
rsi_div_price_divergence -0.027 0.182729 2444
btc_dist14_mean -0.0257 0.203594 2444
rsi_div_span 0.0184 0.363245 2444
rsi_div_rsi_delta -0.0116 0.566145 2444
rsi_div_rsi_divergence -0.0116 0.566145 2444
volume_score 0.0008 0.96722 2444
Table 3. Top correlates of 20-candle close return.
Featureρpn
btc_dist14_mean *** 0.0783 0.000106 2444
rsi_div_span ** -0.0626 0.001973 2444
rsi_14 -0.036 0.075264 2444
rsi_div_price_delta_pct -0.0348 0.085163 2444
rsi_div_price_divergence 0.0348 0.085163 2444
momentum_score 0.0319 0.11467 2444
volume_score 0.0223 0.27075 2444
rsi_div_rsi_delta 0.0172 0.396583 2444
rsi_div_rsi_divergence 0.0172 0.396583 2444
Table 3b. Top correlates of 20-candle max-up (MFE).
Featureρpn
momentum_score *** 0.2356 0.0 2444
rsi_div_price_delta_pct *** -0.1875 0.0 2444
rsi_div_price_divergence *** 0.1875 0.0 2444
btc_dist14_mean *** 0.158 0.0 2444
rsi_14 *** -0.0861 0.00002 2444
rsi_div_span ** -0.0552 0.006317 2444
volume_score * 0.0523 0.009684 2444
rsi_div_rsi_delta 0.0166 0.412567 2444
rsi_div_rsi_divergence 0.0166 0.412567 2444
Table 3c. Top correlates of 20-candle max-down (MAE).
Featureρpn
momentum_score *** -0.1639 0.0 2444
rsi_div_price_delta_pct *** 0.1392 0.0 2444
rsi_div_price_divergence *** -0.1392 0.0 2444
rsi_div_span ** -0.0605 0.002764 2444
btc_dist14_mean * -0.052 0.010152 2444
volume_score * -0.0516 0.0108 2444
rsi_14 * 0.0503 0.012897 2444
rsi_div_rsi_delta -0.0068 0.735536 2444
rsi_div_rsi_divergence -0.0068 0.735536 2444

Outcome mix by timeframe

Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways rates by candle timeframe (hover for exact values).

Figure 2. Stacked exclusive outcome rates by timeframe.

Timeframe breakdown

Table 6. RSI Regular Bullish Divergence split by timeframe.
TF n Coins Hit % BO % BD % SW % Med % Mean %
15m 633 382 48.34 48.34 51.03 0.63 -0.016 0.11
1h 2444 572 46.28 46.28 53.19 0.53 0.032 -0.205
4h 735 374 47.62 47.62 52.11 0.27 0.162 0.48
1d 178 148 47.75 47.75 50.0 2.25 -3.925 -2.831

Methods note

Shared methodology (expand)

Pattern end for this study: For RSI Regular Bullish Divergence, pattern end is the second price extreme of the divergence. There is no trendline walk-forward; the snapshot is that second swing, evaluated over 20 forward candles vs ±1.0× NATR(14).

Outcomes use mutually exclusive classes over the next 20 candles. Headline KPIs and geometry bins are pattern-end: breakout, breakdown, or sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). On trendline families, Fuel / RSI bins add Forming (still inside the lines). Correlations are Spearman with two-sided p-values. See the research hub methods for universe, how every pattern family defines pattern end, dedupe keys, and limitations.

Exclusive class: upside clears +1× natr_14 within 20 candles before downside.
Exclusive class: downside clears −1× natr_14 within 20 candles before upside.
Pattern-end (terminal) unresolved class: neither +1× nor −1× natr_14 cleared within 20 candles after the breached candle. Headline KPIs, ranks, and geometry bins use this sample; Forming is not in that formula. Sideways is not a zero-move class; typical wick travel inside the bands is reported as ×NATR max-up / max-down.
Trendline families only, and only on non-terminal snapshots still inside the lines: neither side tagged within 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins add Forming so four exclusive classes sum to 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%.
$$\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}$$

Labels use ground-truth path outcomes (outcome_label / target_first_hit from full kline OHLC path). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Unresolved non-terminal trendline snapshots are Forming; unresolved terminal snapshots are Sideways. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open proximity, then candle body polarity, then return sign. Pattern-end headline rates: breakout + breakdown + sideways = 100%. Forming+terminal Fuel/RSI bins: breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%.

Limitations & disclosures

  1. This is a historical, in-sample statistical study — not a forward-tested trading strategy. It excludes exchange fees, funding rates, slippage, and execution timing, all of which affect real trading outcomes. A fixed temporal holdout split is reported in methodology for transparency; thresholds are not retuned on the holdout window.
  2. The dataset covers Binance USD-M perpetual futures only. Results may not generalize to spot markets, other exchanges, or lower-liquidity assets with different microstructure.
  3. Confidence and recency filters were switched off while building the dataset, so figures reflect the detector’s raw geometric/RSI trigger rate — not the filtered, higher-conviction signals surfaced live to subscribers.
  4. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways labels use the first ±1.0× NATR threshold (or pattern-specific structural boundary) touched in candle order over the 20-candle forward horizon (target_first_hit / outcome_label). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open gap / nearer threshold from open, then candle body direction.
  5. Overlapping detections were deduplicated on formation start (longest span kept), but different pattern families can still fire on the same underlying move, so correlated market regimes (e.g. one broad rally) can inflate sample counts across several pattern types simultaneously.
  6. Spearman tables use Benjamini–Hochberg FDR q-values; stars also require |ρ| ≥ 0.05. Large samples can still make tiny associations look noteworthy without being economically meaningful. Primary correlations and lifts are within a single timeframe; multi-TF pooled tables are exploratory only.

Glossary

Bull flag / bullish flag
Common search names for the bullish flag chart pattern: a sharp advance (the pole) followed by a downward-sloping or rectangular consolidation. See the Bullish Flag pattern study for breakout statistics.
Head and shoulders pattern
A three-peak reversal pattern (left shoulder, head, right shoulder) with a neckline. Traders search this as “head and shoulders crypto” as well as the full name. See the Head and Shoulders study for exclusive breakdown rates.
Falling wedge bullish
A common query for the falling wedge: converging down-sloping trendlines often treated as a bullish continuation or reversal. See the Falling Wedge study.
Cup and handle pattern
A rounded-bottom continuation pattern with a shallow handle. Also searched as “cup and handle crypto”. See the Cup and Handle study for breakout rates.
Fuel gauge zones
Fixed partitions of Fuel component scores: Dead Water (0.00–0.33), Organic Flow (0.34–0.66), and The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00). Used for Fuel volume/momentum outcome charts on research pages.
NATR(14) & Formation Avg NATR
Normalized Average True Range over 14 periods — average candle range as a percentage of price. In this research, formation average NATR (natr_pattern_avg) is measured across the full pattern span to size breakout/breakdown thresholds (1.0× NATR) relative to market volatility rather than fixed percentages.
\[\mathrm{ATR}_{14}=\mathrm{AverageTrueRange}(H,L,C,14)\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{14}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ATR}_{14}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{\mathrm{avg}}=\dfrac{1}{N}\sum_{i=\mathrm{start}}^{\mathrm{end}}\mathrm{NATR}_{14,i}\]
Breakout / breakdown / sideways
Mutually exclusive outcome classes over the 20-candle forward horizon. Headline KPIs, ranks, and pattern-end geometry bins use breakout, breakdown, and sideways (sum to 100%). Breakout means the +1.0× NATR(14) upside threshold (or resistance trendline/neckline) is touched first; breakdown is the downside class; sideways on those samples means the pattern-end candle already tagged a line but neither ±1.0× NATR printed in the next 20 candles. Sideways is not a zero-move class: typical inside-band wick travel is the sideways ×NATR max-up / max-down. Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes.
\[\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Forming (trendline still inside)
Fourth exclusive class on trendline families (triangles, wedges, channels, flags, pennants) for snapshots that are not the last candle of the formation: price is still between the lines and neither side tagged in the next 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins report breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%. Non-trendline patterns have forming_rate 0.
\[\mathrm{Forming}\iff\text{still inside trendlines and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Both-cleared rate
Share of windows where both +1.0× and −1.0× NATR thresholds were cleared within the 20-candle forward horizon before the exclusive label was assigned. High both-cleared rates indicate volatile two-sided windows.
Expected-direction hit rate
For patterns with a directional bias (e.g. bullish patterns expect a breakout, bearish patterns expect a breakdown), this is the exclusive-class rate for that expected side only. Neutral patterns report breakout and breakdown separately.
Spearman ρ (rho)
A rank correlation coefficient between −1 and 1 that measures monotonic association without assuming a linear relationship or normal distribution — appropriate for skewed, fat-tailed return data. Tables emphasize pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features.
p-value, q-value & significance stars
Two-sided Spearman p-values are adjusted with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR (q-values). Stars require q < 0.05 and |ρ| ≥ 0.05 so large-n micro correlations are not marked significant. Always read stars with effect size.
Wilson 95% CI
Outcome rate fields ending in _ci95 are Wilson score intervals for the binomial point estimate. They quantify sampling uncertainty on rates, not trading risk or costs.
Null baseline / temporal holdout
Null baseline shuffles exclusive outcomes within each timeframe to show a chance expected-direction hit band. Temporal holdout compares rates before vs on/after a fixed cutoff (thresholds not retuned on holdout).
MFE / MAE
Maximum Favorable Excursion and Maximum Adverse Excursion — the best and worst price movement recorded within the forward horizon, expressed as a percentage of the snapshot close. MFE÷|MAE| summarizes average upside versus downside excursion magnitude.
\[\mathrm{MFE}=\mathrm{max\_up}_{20c}=\dfrac{\max(H_{t+1},\ldots,H_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{MAE}=\mathrm{max\_down}_{20c}=\dfrac{\min(L_{t+1},\ldots,L_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
Timeframe-specific feature bins
On each pattern study, feature distributions are computed separately for 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d. Use the timeframe control to switch; never treat pooled multi-TF histograms as interchangeable because candle horizons differ.
Feature quartile bins
Numeric features that are not Fuel, RSI, or σ-banded (e.g. slopes, current_scale_number, btc_dist14_mean) are split into quartiles. Each bin reports exclusive breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates plus mean MFE.
Feature typical / elevated bands
geom_width and head-and-shoulders symmetry use mean ± σ bands computed separately per pattern and timeframe: below typical (< μ−σ), typical (μ±σ), elevated (μ+σ to μ+2σ), and extreme (> μ+2σ). Pattern height and extension age use the same labels after a log1p transform so right-tailed size features are not dominated by outliers. Bins are never pooled across timeframes.
Pattern end (snapshot candle)
The single candle where features (RSI, Fuel, BTC context) and the forward 20-candle outcome window are measured. Trendline families use the last close still inside ±0.5× NATR of the projected channel; doubles/triples use a neckline re-touch within ±0.5× NATR; H&S uses the neckline break; cup & handle uses the rim touch after the handle; RSI divergences use the second price extreme. See Data & methodology for the full family list.
BTC regime (btc_dist14_median)
Terciles of BTC last-14 median distance at the live snapshot (btc_weak / btc_mid / btc_strong). Used as a simple proxy for BTC-relative market regime when slicing outcome rates (not in correlation ranks).
volume_score (Fuel volume)
Closed-candle volume vs a 20-period SMA, mapped to 0–1 with a small trend adjustment. Same Fuel Index volume component as the live gauge; open (forming) candle is not used.
\[\mathrm{volume\_ratio}=\dfrac{V_{t}}{\mathrm{SMA}(V,20)}\]
Piecewise base score from volume_ratio:
\[\mathrm{ratio}<0.8:\ \mathrm{base}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}}{0.8}\times 0.25\]
\[0.8\le\mathrm{ratio}\le 1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.3+\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-0.8}{0.7}\times 0.3\]
\[\mathrm{ratio}>1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.6+\min\!\bigl(1,\tfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-1.5}{1.5}\bigr)\times 0.4\]
\[\mathrm{trend\_adj}=\mathrm{clamp}(s_{V}\times 0.15,-0.05,+0.05)\]
\[\mathrm{volume\_score}=\mathrm{clamp}(\mathrm{base}+\mathrm{trend\_adj},\,0,\,1)\]
momentum_score (Fuel momentum)
Direction-agnostic energy score from RSI(14), 3-bar RSI change, and timeframe-specific ROC. Same Fuel Index momentum component as the live gauge.
\[\mathrm{ROC}=\dfrac{C_{t}-C_{t-N}}{C_{t-N}}\]
\[\Delta\mathrm{RSI}_{3}=\mathrm{RSI}_{t}-\mathrm{RSI}_{t-3}\]
ROC lookback N by timeframe: 15m→8, 1h→5, 4h→3, 1d→2.
\[\mathrm{momentum\_score}\in[0,1]\ \text{(RSI/ROC regime map)}\]
rsi_14
14-period Relative Strength Index on the asset close at the live snapshot (forming + terminal; feature_builder: RSIIndicator(close, window=14)).
\[U_{t}=\max(C_{t}-C_{t-1},0),\quad D_{t}=\max(C_{t-1}-C_{t},0)\]
\[\mathrm{RS}=\dfrac{\mathrm{SMA}(U,14)}{\mathrm{SMA}(D,14)}\]
\[\mathrm{RSI}_{14}=100-\dfrac{100}{1+\mathrm{RS}}\]
rsi_div_span
Candle count between the first and second price extremes of an RSI divergence.
\[\mathrm{rsi\_div\_span}=i^{\mathrm{price}}_{2}-i^{\mathrm{price}}_{1}\]
rsi_div_price_divergence
Signed relative price move between extremes (detector confidence input).
\[\mathrm{price\_div}=\mathrm{signed}\,\dfrac{|P_{2}-P_{1}|}{P_{1}}\]
rsi_div_rsi_divergence
Signed RSI move between extremes, scaled by 100 (detector confidence input).
\[\mathrm{rsi\_div}=\mathrm{signed}\,\dfrac{|\mathrm{RSI}_{2}-\mathrm{RSI}_{1}|}{100}\]
btc_dist14_mean
Mean of BTC last-14 percentage distances (feature_builder dist14_mean on BTC).
\[\delta_{i}=\dfrac{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t-i}-C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}\times 100,\quad i=1,\ldots,14\]
\[\mathrm{btc\_dist14\_mean}=\dfrac{1}{14}\sum_{i=1}^{14}\delta_{i}\]
rsi_div_price_delta_pct
Percent price change from first to second extreme
rsi_div_rsi_delta
RSI-point change from first to second extreme

Frequently asked questions

How to trade RSI Regular Bullish Divergence using this crypto chart pattern study?

This page reports historical RSI Regular Bullish Divergence breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates on Binance USD-M futures. Use the rates, typical travel, and timeframe tables as educational context — not a live trade signal.

Do RSI Regular Bullish Divergence chart patterns work?

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence was evaluated on 3,990 deduplicated snapshots across 643 Binance USD-M futures symbols. Exclusive outcomes below show how often the pattern broke out, broke down, or stayed sideways — not a guarantee that any single setup will follow the average.

What is the sample size for RSI Regular Bullish Divergence?

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence was evaluated on 3,990 deduplicated snapshots across 643 Binance USD-M futures symbols.

How is the pattern end candle chosen for RSI Regular Bullish Divergence?

For RSI Regular Bullish Divergence, pattern end is the second price extreme of the divergence. There is no trendline walk-forward; the snapshot is that second swing, evaluated over 20 forward candles vs ±1.0× NATR(14).

RSI Regular Bullish Divergence breakout rate: how often does RSI Regular Bullish Divergence break out, break down, or go sideways?

Under a mutually exclusive ±1× NATR / 20-candle classification, breakout was 46.92%, breakdown 52.51%, and sideways 0.57%; expected-direction hit rate was 46.92%.

Which timeframe works best for RSI Regular Bullish Divergence in this study?

Among timeframes present, 15m had the highest expected-direction hit rate at 48.34% (n=633).

What feature correlates most with RSI Regular Bullish Divergence breakouts?

Within RSI Regular Bullish Divergence only, the strongest Spearman correlate of breakout success was momentum_score (ρ=0.041, n=2,444). Effect sizes remain modest.

Is this financial advice?

No. These are educational historical statistics only. Past pattern outcomes do not guarantee future results.

Watch RSI Regular Bullish Divergence live

ChartDatabase scans this pattern across 500+ Binance futures pairs with alerts.

How to cite this study

ChartDatabase Research Team (2026). “RSI Regular Bullish Divergence: Breakout & Breakdown Statistics on Binance Futures (n=3,990).” In What Actually Drives Crypto Chart Pattern Breakouts? ChartDatabase. https://chartdatabase.com/research/rsi_regular_bullish_divergence/