Skip to main content

Research · Pattern studies · Reverse Head & Shoulders

ChartDatabase Research · Chart pattern study

Reverse Head & Shoulders Pattern

Timeframe

1h timeframe — 7924 snapshots across 653 Binance USDT‑M futures markets — bullish bias. Results are not mixed with other candle intervals.

Abstract

Reverse Head & Shoulders statistics on the 1h timeframe only (n=7924). Timeframes are analyzed separately and never pooled — 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d horizons are not interchangeable. Use the timeframe control under the title to switch. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways: 71.54% / 27.06% / 1.4%.

Keywords Reverse Head & Shoulders patternReverse Head & Shoulders breakoutReverse Head & Shoulders cryptohow to trade Reverse Head & ShouldersReverse Head & Shoulders success rateinverse head and shouldersreverse head and shoulders patterncrypto chart patternschart pattern success rate

Key results (1h only)

Key findings
  1. Reverse Head & Shoulders on 1h: n=7,924 snapshots across 653 coins — breakout 71.54%, breakdown 27.06%, sideways 1.4% (exclusive classes; not pooled with other timeframes).
  2. Expected-direction (bullish) hit rate on 1h: 71.54%.
  3. Mean max-up / max-down on 1h: 4.572% / -3.859% (MFE÷|MAE| ≈ 1.185); median 20-candle close return 0.0%.
Snapshots
7924
Coins
653unique symbols
Hit rate
71.54%expected direction
Breakout
71.54%exclusive
Breakdown
27.06%exclusive
Sideways
1.4%neither
Median ret.
0.0%
MFE ÷ |MAE|
1.185

Scope for this pattern

  • Exchange / market: Binance USD-M Futures (perpetual contracts).
  • Pattern end: For Reverse Head & Shoulders, pattern end is the neckline break confirmation candle. All features and the next-20-candle study window begin at that bar, measuring downside continuation (−1.0× NATR from neckline) vs invalidation.
  • Active timeframe: 1h only — other intervals (15m, 1h, 4h, 1d) are available via the control under the title and are never mixed into these figures.
  • Outcome horizon: next 20 candles on the selected timeframe. Headline KPIs use pattern-end snapshots: mutually exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). Fuel and RSI bins on trendline families also report Forming (still inside the lines).

Results (1h)

Return distribution

All figures below are for Reverse Head & Shoulders on the 1h timeframe only (n=7924). Timeframes are never pooled — a 15m candle horizon is not comparable to 1d. Mean return 0.244%, median 0.0%; exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways 71.54% / 27.06% / 1.4%. Mean MFE / MAE 4.572% / -3.859%.

Figure 1. 20-candle close return (%) for Reverse Head & Shoulders on 1h, clipped to ±16%.

Wick max-up / max-down over the same 20-candle window, expressed as NATR multiples. Sideways is not a spike at 0.

Figure 1b. 20-candle wick max-up (×NATR) on 1h.

Figure 1c. 20-candle wick max-down (×NATR).

Distribution statistics

  • Mean return: 0.244%
  • Median: % (P25 -2.527 · P75 2.552)
  • Std. deviation: 6.581%
  • Win rate (ret > 0): 49.91%
  • Mean MFE / MAE: 4.572% / -3.859%
  • Median max-up / max-down (×NATR): 1.717 / -1.553
  • Sideways rate: 1.4% (pattern-end unresolved; not a zero-move class; see ×NATR histograms)
  • Both-cleared (pre-label): 36.74%

Fuel volume & momentum scores

Fuel volume and momentum scores below use only Reverse Head & Shoulders snapshots on 1h. Zones match the live Fuel gauge (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg); each zone reports mean max-up / max-down over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

volume_score (n=7924; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 64.48% in Dead Water (0.00–0.33) to 86.69% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a substantial difference of +22.21 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 33.04% to 13.11% (-19.93 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 2.48% to 0.20% (-2.28 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 64.48% in Dead Water to 86.69% in The Powder Keg (+22.21 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in The Powder Keg (5.231%), compared with 4.307% in Dead Water and 5.231% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 12% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Dead Water0.00–0.33
n=3018
BO 64.48% BD 33.04% SW 2.48% FM 0.0%
Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=2862
BO 68.17% BD 30.71% SW 1.12% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=2044
BO 86.69% BD 13.11% SW 0.2% FM 0.0%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by Fuel volume score.

Empirical density of volume score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel volume score.

volume_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Dead Water 0.00–0.33 3018 4.307 -3.432 64.48 33.04 2.48 0.0
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 2862 4.38 -3.853 68.17 30.71 1.12 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 2044 5.231 -4.499 86.69 13.11 0.2 0.0

momentum_score (n=7924; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 66.27% in Organic Flow (0.34–0.66) to 83.01% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a substantial difference of +16.74 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 31.88% to 16.55% (-15.33 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.85% to 0.44% (-1.41 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 66.27% in Organic Flow to 83.01% in The Powder Keg (+16.74 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in The Powder Keg (5.764%), compared with 4.024% in Organic Flow and 5.764% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower Fuel momentum score readings (peak bin ≈ 26% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=5429
BO 66.27% BD 31.88% SW 1.85% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=2495
BO 83.01% BD 16.55% SW 0.44% FM 0.0%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by Fuel momentum score.

Empirical density of momentum score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel momentum score.

momentum_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 5429 4.024 -3.556 66.27 31.88 1.85 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 2495 5.764 -4.519 83.01 16.55 0.44 0.0

Feature distributions vs max-up / max-down

Feature bins below use only Reverse Head & Shoulders snapshots on 1h. Each bin reports mean max-up (MFE) and mean max-down (MAE) over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

rsi_14 (n=7924; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 64.90% in the lowest quartile (30–50; 30–50) to 95.90% in the highest (70–90; 70–90), a substantial difference of +31.00 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 32.31% to 3.75% (-28.56 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 2.79% to 0.35% (-2.44 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 64.90% in 30–50 to 95.90% in 70–90 (+31.00 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in 70–90 (7.530%), compared with 4.221% in 30–50 and 7.530% in 70–90. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 13% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot alone does not isolate a trading rule.

30–50
n=1074
BO 64.9% BD 32.31% SW 2.79% FM 0.0%
50–70
n=6554
BO 71.54% BD 27.25% SW 1.21% FM 0.0%
70–90
n=293
BO 95.9% BD 3.75% SW 0.35% FM 0.0%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by rsi 14.

The histogram shows the empirical density of rsi 14 for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot.

rsi_14 bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
30–50 30–50 1074 4.221 -3.789 64.9 32.31 2.79 0.0
50–70 50–70 6554 4.478 -3.793 71.54 27.25 1.21 0.0
70–90 70–90 293 7.53 -5.543 95.9 3.75 0.35 0.0

geom_height (n=7924; last snapshot per formation)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded pattern height (price span of the formation) are partitioned into log-transformed mean ± σ bands (below typical / typical / elevated / extreme). Exclusive breakout rates run from 71.39% in Typical (-0.438 – 1.96) to 74.67% in Extreme (5.81 – 4.01e+03), a material difference of +3.28 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 27.24% to 23.03% (-4.21 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.37% to 2.30% (+0.93 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 71.39% in Typical to 74.67% in Extreme (+3.28 percentage points; material shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Typical (4.596%), compared with 4.596% in Typical and 4.038% in Extreme. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower pattern height readings (peak bin ≈ 97% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on pattern height (price span of the formation) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Typical-0.438 – 1.96
n=7427
BO 71.39% BD 27.24% SW 1.37%
Elevated1.96 – 5.81
n=193
BO 72.54% BD 26.42% SW 1.04%
Extreme5.81 – 4.01e+03
n=304
BO 74.67% BD 23.03% SW 2.3%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by height.

The histogram shows the empirical density of height for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of pattern height.

geom_height bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Typical -0.438 – 1.96 7427 4.596 -3.89 71.39 27.24 1.37
Elevated 1.96 – 5.81 193 4.458 -3.815 72.54 26.42 1.04
Extreme 5.81 – 4.01e+03 304 4.038 -3.128 74.67 23.03 2.3

geom_width (n=7924; last snapshot per formation)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded pattern width (duration in candles) are partitioned into mean ± σ bands (below typical / typical / elevated / extreme). Exclusive breakout rates run from 68.48% in Below typical (17 – 24.7) to 75.87% in Extreme (53.1 – 92), a substantial difference of +7.39 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 29.89% to 23.08% (-6.81 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.63% to 1.05% (-0.58 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 68.48% in Below typical to 75.87% in Extreme (+7.39 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Extreme (5.272%), compared with 4.533% in Below typical and 5.272% in Extreme. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 14% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on pattern width (duration in candles) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Below typical17 – 24.7
n=1104
BO 68.48% BD 29.89% SW 1.63%
Typical24.7 – 43.6
n=5630
BO 71.72% BD 26.93% SW 1.35%
Elevated43.6 – 53.1
n=904
BO 72.79% BD 25.66% SW 1.55%
Extreme53.1 – 92
n=286
BO 75.87% BD 23.08% SW 1.05%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by width.

The histogram shows the empirical density of width for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of pattern width.

geom_width bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Below typical 17 – 24.7 1104 4.533 -3.953 68.48 29.89 1.63
Typical 24.7 – 43.6 5630 4.497 -3.879 71.72 26.93 1.35
Elevated 43.6 – 53.1 904 4.863 -3.431 72.79 25.66 1.55
Extreme 53.1 – 92 286 5.272 -4.458 75.87 23.08 1.05

geom_breakout_potential (n=7924; last snapshot per formation)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded breakout-potential score from pattern geometry are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 70.74% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 0.299 – 0.6) to 72.30% in the highest (Q4; 0.8 – 1), a modest difference of +1.56 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 28.14% to 26.05% (-2.09 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.12% to 1.65% (+0.53 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 70.74% in Q1 to 72.30% in Q4 (+1.56 percentage points; modest shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (5.582%), compared with 3.663% in Q1 and 5.582% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 26% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on breakout-potential score from pattern geometry alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q10.299 – 0.6
n=3028
BO 70.74% BD 28.14% SW 1.12%
Q20.6 – 0.7
n=2037
BO 72.26% BD 26.36% SW 1.38%
Q30.7 – 0.8
n=1711
BO 71.6% BD 26.65% SW 1.75%
Q40.8 – 1
n=1148
BO 72.3% BD 26.05% SW 1.65%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by breakout potential.

The histogram shows the empirical density of breakout potential for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of breakout-potential score from pattern geometry.

geom_breakout_potential bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 0.299 – 0.6 3028 3.663 -3.622 70.74 28.14 1.12
Q2 0.6 – 0.7 2037 4.933 -3.973 72.26 26.36 1.38
Q3 0.7 – 0.8 1711 5.072 -3.9 71.6 26.65 1.75
Q4 0.8 – 1 1148 5.582 -4.223 72.3 26.05 1.65

geom_resistance_slope (n=7924; last snapshot per formation)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded slope of the resistance line bounding the pattern are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 70.08% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -67.7 – -0.000333) to 75.06% in the highest (Q4; 2.33e-05 – 56.7), a material difference of +4.98 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 27.91% to 24.28% (-3.63 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 2.01% to 0.66% (-1.35 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 70.08% in Q1 to 75.06% in Q4 (+4.98 percentage points; material shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (4.903%), compared with 4.487% in Q1 and 4.903% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 91% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on slope of the resistance line bounding the pattern alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-67.7 – -0.000333
n=1985
BO 70.08% BD 27.91% SW 2.01%
Q2-0.000333 – -1.54e-05
n=1977
BO 69.55% BD 28.53% SW 1.92%
Q3-1.54e-05 – 2.33e-05
n=1981
BO 71.48% BD 27.51% SW 1.01%
Q42.33e-05 – 56.7
n=1981
BO 75.06% BD 24.28% SW 0.66%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by resistance slope.

The histogram shows the empirical density of resistance slope for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of slope of the resistance line bounding the pattern.

geom_resistance_slope bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 -67.7 – -0.000333 1985 4.487 -3.746 70.08 27.91 2.01
Q2 -0.000333 – -1.54e-05 1977 4.292 -3.655 69.55 28.53 1.92
Q3 -1.54e-05 – 2.33e-05 1981 4.605 -3.749 71.48 27.51 1.01
Q4 2.33e-05 – 56.7 1981 4.903 -4.287 75.06 24.28 0.66

btc_dist14_mean (n=7924; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded BTC last-14 mean distance are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 75.82% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -10.2 – -1.07) to 70.22% in the highest (Q4; -0.0578 – 6.07), a substantial difference of -5.60 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 23.27% to 28.41% (+5.14 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 0.91% to 1.37% (+0.46 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 75.82% in Q1 to 70.22% in Q4 (-5.60 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (5.155%), compared with 4.932% in Q1 and 5.155% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 23% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on BTC last-14 mean distance alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-10.2 – -1.07
n=1981
BO 75.82% BD 23.27% SW 0.91% FM 0.0%
Q2-1.07 – -0.441
n=1981
BO 72.03% BD 26.5% SW 1.47% FM 0.0%
Q3-0.441 – -0.0578
n=1984
BO 68.09% BD 30.04% SW 1.87% FM 0.0%
Q4-0.0578 – 6.07
n=1978
BO 70.22% BD 28.41% SW 1.37% FM 0.0%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by btc mean.

The histogram shows the empirical density of btc mean for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of BTC last-14 mean distance.

btc_dist14_mean bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Q1 -10.2 – -1.07 1981 4.932 -3.782 75.82 23.27 0.91 0.0
Q2 -1.07 – -0.441 1981 4.179 -3.441 72.03 26.5 1.47 0.0
Q3 -0.441 – -0.0578 1984 4.022 -3.831 68.09 30.04 1.87 0.0
Q4 -0.0578 – 6.07 1978 5.155 -4.383 70.22 28.41 1.37 0.0

current_scale_number (n=7924; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout) are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 56.23% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -0.001 – 1.05) to 90.06% in the highest (Q4; 1.29 – 104), a substantial difference of +33.83 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 41.85% to 9.04% (-32.81 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.92% to 0.90% (-1.02 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 56.23% in Q1 to 90.06% in Q4 (+33.83 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q4 (4.851%), compared with 4.349% in Q1 and 4.851% in Q4. The value histogram is concentrated toward lower position in the live channel readings (peak bin ≈ 48% of mass), with a thinner right-hand tail. Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-0.001 – 1.05
n=1981
BO 56.23% BD 41.85% SW 1.92% FM 0.0%
Q21.05 – 1.13
n=1981
BO 63.71% BD 34.63% SW 1.66% FM 0.0%
Q31.13 – 1.29
n=1981
BO 76.17% BD 22.72% SW 1.11% FM 0.0%
Q41.29 – 104
n=1981
BO 90.06% BD 9.04% SW 0.9% FM 0.0%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by Pattern scale.

The histogram shows the empirical density of Pattern scale for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of position in the live channel.

current_scale_number bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Q1 -0.001 – 1.05 1981 4.349 -3.86 56.23 41.85 1.92 0.0
Q2 1.05 – 1.13 1981 4.444 -3.656 63.71 34.63 1.66 0.0
Q3 1.13 – 1.29 1981 4.642 -3.715 76.17 22.72 1.11 0.0
Q4 1.29 – 104 1981 4.851 -4.205 90.06 9.04 0.9 0.0

geom_hs_completion_score (n=7924; last snapshot per formation)

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders (1h), 7,924 snapshots with recorded head-and-shoulders completion score are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 71.26% in the lowest quartile (Q1; 0.449 – 0.9) to 71.85% in the highest (Q2; 0.9 – 1), a negligible difference of +0.59 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 27.46% to 26.60% (-0.86 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 1.28% to 1.55% (+0.27 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 71.26% in Q1 to 71.85% in Q2 (+0.59 percentage points; negligible shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q2 (5.310%), compared with 3.907% in Q1 and 5.310% in Q2. The value histogram piles up toward higher readings (peak bin ≈ 47% of mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on head-and-shoulders completion score alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q10.449 – 0.9
n=4169
BO 71.26% BD 27.46% SW 1.28%
Q20.9 – 1
n=3755
BO 71.85% BD 26.6% SW 1.55%

Reverse Head & Shoulders outcomes by hs completion score.

The histogram shows the empirical density of hs completion score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of head-and-shoulders completion score.

geom_hs_completion_score bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW %
Q1 0.449 – 0.9 4169 3.907 -3.632 71.26 27.46 1.28
Q2 0.9 – 1 3755 5.31 -4.111 71.85 26.6 1.55

Timeframe comparison

Side-by-side comparison across timeframes for Reverse Head & Shoulders. Each column is an independent sample — use it to contrast horizons, not as a pooled average.

Table. Reverse Head & Shoulders comparative outcomes by timeframe.
TF n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ ↑/|↓| Hit % BO % BD % SW %
15m 2829 2.076 -2.05 1.013 68.12 68.12 31.07 0.81
1h 7924 4.572 -3.859 1.185 71.54 71.54 27.06 1.4
4h 2416 10.583 -8.142 1.3 70.49 70.49 28.15 1.36
1d 310 29.234 -17.487 1.672 73.87 73.87 22.9 3.23

Feature correlations

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders on 1h, the strongest absolute Spearman correlate of breakout is current_scale_number (ρ = 0.2882***). Ranks use pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features. * p<0.05 · ** p<0.01 · *** p<0.001.

vs Breakout success

Table 1. Top breakout correlates.
Featureρpn
current_scale_number *** 0.2882 0.0 7924
volume_score *** 0.1874 0.0 7924
momentum_score *** 0.1752 0.0 7924
rsi_14 *** 0.1727 0.0 7924
btc_dist14_mean *** -0.0559 0.000001 7924
geom_resistance_slope 0.0445 0.000075 7924
geom_width 0.0289 0.010069 7924
geom_hs_completion_score 0.0198 0.078315 7924
geom_hs_symmetry_score 0.0183 0.102409 7924
geom_breakout_potential 0.0109 0.332424 7924
geom_height 0.0098 0.383168 7924

vs Breakdown success

Table 2. Top breakdown correlates.
Featureρpn
current_scale_number *** -0.2832 0.0 7924
volume_score *** -0.1664 0.0 7924
momentum_score *** -0.1634 0.0 7924
rsi_14 *** -0.1543 0.0 7924
btc_dist14_mean *** 0.0525 0.000003 7924
geom_resistance_slope -0.032 0.004358 7924
geom_width -0.0274 0.014738 7924
geom_hs_completion_score -0.0229 0.041482 7924
geom_breakout_potential -0.0166 0.139599 7924
geom_hs_symmetry_score -0.016 0.154262 7924
geom_height -0.0107 0.339858 7924
Table 3. Top correlates of 20-candle close return.
Featureρpn
geom_breakout_potential *** 0.053 0.000002 7924
btc_dist14_mean -0.0475 0.000023 7924
volume_score -0.0436 0.000105 7924
geom_hs_completion_score 0.0418 0.000196 7924
rsi_14 -0.0369 0.001014 7924
geom_width 0.0345 0.00215 7924
momentum_score -0.0336 0.002788 7924
geom_resistance_slope -0.0277 0.013791 7924
geom_height 0.0173 0.122919 7924
geom_hs_symmetry_score -0.0148 0.187693 7924
current_scale_number -0.0122 0.276556 7924
Table 3b. Top correlates of 20-candle max-up (MFE).
Featureρpn
geom_breakout_potential *** 0.164 0.0 7924
geom_hs_completion_score *** 0.1626 0.0 7924
momentum_score *** 0.1353 0.0 7924
rsi_14 *** 0.054 0.000002 7924
volume_score 0.0412 0.000245 7924
btc_dist14_mean -0.0363 0.001238 7924
geom_height 0.0355 0.001559 7924
current_scale_number 0.0298 0.007912 7924
geom_width 0.027 0.016153 7924
geom_resistance_slope 0.0128 0.25536 7924
geom_hs_symmetry_score 0.0021 0.848666 7924
Table 3c. Top correlates of 20-candle max-down (MAE).
Featureρpn
momentum_score *** -0.1886 0.0 7924
volume_score *** -0.1045 0.0 7924
rsi_14 *** -0.102 0.0 7924
geom_hs_completion_score *** -0.0903 0.0 7924
geom_breakout_potential *** -0.0623 0.0 7924
geom_resistance_slope *** -0.0608 0.0 7924
btc_dist14_mean *** -0.0522 0.000003 7924
current_scale_number -0.0367 0.00107 7924
geom_width 0.0203 0.071229 7924
geom_height -0.0125 0.264189 7924
geom_hs_symmetry_score -0.0103 0.360843 7924

Outcome mix by timeframe

Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways rates by candle timeframe (hover for exact values).

Figure 2. Stacked exclusive outcome rates by timeframe.

Timeframe breakdown

Table 6. Reverse Head & Shoulders split by timeframe.
TF n Coins Hit % BO % BD % SW % Med % Mean %
15m 2829 544 68.12 68.12 31.07 0.81 -0.231 -0.115
1h 7924 653 71.54 71.54 27.06 1.4 0.0 0.244
4h 2416 549 70.49 70.49 28.15 1.36 -0.536 -0.077
1d 310 218 73.87 73.87 22.9 3.23 -3.362 1.989

Methods note

Shared methodology (expand)

Pattern end for this study: For Reverse Head & Shoulders, pattern end is the neckline break confirmation candle. All features and the next-20-candle study window begin at that bar, measuring downside continuation (−1.0× NATR from neckline) vs invalidation.

Outcomes use mutually exclusive classes over the next 20 candles. Headline KPIs and geometry bins are pattern-end: breakout, breakdown, or sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). On trendline families, Fuel / RSI bins add Forming (still inside the lines). Correlations are Spearman with two-sided p-values. See the research hub methods for universe, how every pattern family defines pattern end, dedupe keys, and limitations.

Exclusive class: upside clears +1× natr_14 within 20 candles before downside.
Exclusive class: downside clears −1× natr_14 within 20 candles before upside.
Pattern-end (terminal) unresolved class: neither +1× nor −1× natr_14 cleared within 20 candles after the breached candle. Headline KPIs, ranks, and geometry bins use this sample; Forming is not in that formula. Sideways is not a zero-move class; typical wick travel inside the bands is reported as ×NATR max-up / max-down.
Trendline families only, and only on non-terminal snapshots still inside the lines: neither side tagged within 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins add Forming so four exclusive classes sum to 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%.
$$\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}$$

Labels use ground-truth path outcomes (outcome_label / target_first_hit from full kline OHLC path). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Unresolved non-terminal trendline snapshots are Forming; unresolved terminal snapshots are Sideways. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open proximity, then candle body polarity, then return sign. Pattern-end headline rates: breakout + breakdown + sideways = 100%. Forming+terminal Fuel/RSI bins: breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%.

Limitations & disclosures

  1. This is a historical, in-sample statistical study — not a forward-tested trading strategy. It excludes exchange fees, funding rates, slippage, and execution timing, all of which affect real trading outcomes. A fixed temporal holdout split is reported in methodology for transparency; thresholds are not retuned on the holdout window.
  2. The dataset covers Binance USD-M perpetual futures only. Results may not generalize to spot markets, other exchanges, or lower-liquidity assets with different microstructure.
  3. Confidence and recency filters were switched off while building the dataset, so figures reflect the detector’s raw geometric/RSI trigger rate — not the filtered, higher-conviction signals surfaced live to subscribers.
  4. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways labels use the first ±1.0× NATR threshold (or pattern-specific structural boundary) touched in candle order over the 20-candle forward horizon (target_first_hit / outcome_label). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open gap / nearer threshold from open, then candle body direction.
  5. Overlapping detections were deduplicated on formation start (longest span kept), but different pattern families can still fire on the same underlying move, so correlated market regimes (e.g. one broad rally) can inflate sample counts across several pattern types simultaneously.
  6. Spearman tables use Benjamini–Hochberg FDR q-values; stars also require |ρ| ≥ 0.05. Large samples can still make tiny associations look noteworthy without being economically meaningful. Primary correlations and lifts are within a single timeframe; multi-TF pooled tables are exploratory only.

Glossary

Bull flag / bullish flag
Common search names for the bullish flag chart pattern: a sharp advance (the pole) followed by a downward-sloping or rectangular consolidation. See the Bullish Flag pattern study for breakout statistics.
Head and shoulders pattern
A three-peak reversal pattern (left shoulder, head, right shoulder) with a neckline. Traders search this as “head and shoulders crypto” as well as the full name. See the Head and Shoulders study for exclusive breakdown rates.
Falling wedge bullish
A common query for the falling wedge: converging down-sloping trendlines often treated as a bullish continuation or reversal. See the Falling Wedge study.
Cup and handle pattern
A rounded-bottom continuation pattern with a shallow handle. Also searched as “cup and handle crypto”. See the Cup and Handle study for breakout rates.
Fuel gauge zones
Fixed partitions of Fuel component scores: Dead Water (0.00–0.33), Organic Flow (0.34–0.66), and The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00). Used for Fuel volume/momentum outcome charts on research pages.
NATR(14) & Formation Avg NATR
Normalized Average True Range over 14 periods — average candle range as a percentage of price. In this research, formation average NATR (natr_pattern_avg) is measured across the full pattern span to size breakout/breakdown thresholds (1.0× NATR) relative to market volatility rather than fixed percentages.
\[\mathrm{ATR}_{14}=\mathrm{AverageTrueRange}(H,L,C,14)\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{14}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ATR}_{14}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{\mathrm{avg}}=\dfrac{1}{N}\sum_{i=\mathrm{start}}^{\mathrm{end}}\mathrm{NATR}_{14,i}\]
Breakout / breakdown / sideways
Mutually exclusive outcome classes over the 20-candle forward horizon. Headline KPIs, ranks, and pattern-end geometry bins use breakout, breakdown, and sideways (sum to 100%). Breakout means the +1.0× NATR(14) upside threshold (or resistance trendline/neckline) is touched first; breakdown is the downside class; sideways on those samples means the pattern-end candle already tagged a line but neither ±1.0× NATR printed in the next 20 candles. Sideways is not a zero-move class: typical inside-band wick travel is the sideways ×NATR max-up / max-down. Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes.
\[\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Forming (trendline still inside)
Fourth exclusive class on trendline families (triangles, wedges, channels, flags, pennants) for snapshots that are not the last candle of the formation: price is still between the lines and neither side tagged in the next 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins report breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%. Non-trendline patterns have forming_rate 0.
\[\mathrm{Forming}\iff\text{still inside trendlines and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Both-cleared rate
Share of windows where both +1.0× and −1.0× NATR thresholds were cleared within the 20-candle forward horizon before the exclusive label was assigned. High both-cleared rates indicate volatile two-sided windows.
Expected-direction hit rate
For patterns with a directional bias (e.g. bullish patterns expect a breakout, bearish patterns expect a breakdown), this is the exclusive-class rate for that expected side only. Neutral patterns report breakout and breakdown separately.
Spearman ρ (rho)
A rank correlation coefficient between −1 and 1 that measures monotonic association without assuming a linear relationship or normal distribution — appropriate for skewed, fat-tailed return data. Tables emphasize pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features.
p-value, q-value & significance stars
Two-sided Spearman p-values are adjusted with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR (q-values). Stars require q < 0.05 and |ρ| ≥ 0.05 so large-n micro correlations are not marked significant. Always read stars with effect size.
Wilson 95% CI
Outcome rate fields ending in _ci95 are Wilson score intervals for the binomial point estimate. They quantify sampling uncertainty on rates, not trading risk or costs.
Null baseline / temporal holdout
Null baseline shuffles exclusive outcomes within each timeframe to show a chance expected-direction hit band. Temporal holdout compares rates before vs on/after a fixed cutoff (thresholds not retuned on holdout).
MFE / MAE
Maximum Favorable Excursion and Maximum Adverse Excursion — the best and worst price movement recorded within the forward horizon, expressed as a percentage of the snapshot close. MFE÷|MAE| summarizes average upside versus downside excursion magnitude.
\[\mathrm{MFE}=\mathrm{max\_up}_{20c}=\dfrac{\max(H_{t+1},\ldots,H_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{MAE}=\mathrm{max\_down}_{20c}=\dfrac{\min(L_{t+1},\ldots,L_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
Timeframe-specific feature bins
On each pattern study, feature distributions are computed separately for 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d. Use the timeframe control to switch; never treat pooled multi-TF histograms as interchangeable because candle horizons differ.
Feature quartile bins
Numeric features that are not Fuel, RSI, or σ-banded (e.g. slopes, current_scale_number, btc_dist14_mean) are split into quartiles. Each bin reports exclusive breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates plus mean MFE.
Feature typical / elevated bands
geom_width and head-and-shoulders symmetry use mean ± σ bands computed separately per pattern and timeframe: below typical (< μ−σ), typical (μ±σ), elevated (μ+σ to μ+2σ), and extreme (> μ+2σ). Pattern height and extension age use the same labels after a log1p transform so right-tailed size features are not dominated by outliers. Bins are never pooled across timeframes.
Pattern end (snapshot candle)
The single candle where features (RSI, Fuel, BTC context) and the forward 20-candle outcome window are measured. Trendline families use the last close still inside ±0.5× NATR of the projected channel; doubles/triples use a neckline re-touch within ±0.5× NATR; H&S uses the neckline break; cup & handle uses the rim touch after the handle; RSI divergences use the second price extreme. See Data & methodology for the full family list.
BTC regime (btc_dist14_median)
Terciles of BTC last-14 median distance at the live snapshot (btc_weak / btc_mid / btc_strong). Used as a simple proxy for BTC-relative market regime when slicing outcome rates (not in correlation ranks).
volume_score (Fuel volume)
Closed-candle volume vs a 20-period SMA, mapped to 0–1 with a small trend adjustment. Same Fuel Index volume component as the live gauge; open (forming) candle is not used.
\[\mathrm{volume\_ratio}=\dfrac{V_{t}}{\mathrm{SMA}(V,20)}\]
Piecewise base score from volume_ratio:
\[\mathrm{ratio}<0.8:\ \mathrm{base}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}}{0.8}\times 0.25\]
\[0.8\le\mathrm{ratio}\le 1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.3+\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-0.8}{0.7}\times 0.3\]
\[\mathrm{ratio}>1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.6+\min\!\bigl(1,\tfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-1.5}{1.5}\bigr)\times 0.4\]
\[\mathrm{trend\_adj}=\mathrm{clamp}(s_{V}\times 0.15,-0.05,+0.05)\]
\[\mathrm{volume\_score}=\mathrm{clamp}(\mathrm{base}+\mathrm{trend\_adj},\,0,\,1)\]
momentum_score (Fuel momentum)
Direction-agnostic energy score from RSI(14), 3-bar RSI change, and timeframe-specific ROC. Same Fuel Index momentum component as the live gauge.
\[\mathrm{ROC}=\dfrac{C_{t}-C_{t-N}}{C_{t-N}}\]
\[\Delta\mathrm{RSI}_{3}=\mathrm{RSI}_{t}-\mathrm{RSI}_{t-3}\]
ROC lookback N by timeframe: 15m→8, 1h→5, 4h→3, 1d→2.
\[\mathrm{momentum\_score}\in[0,1]\ \text{(RSI/ROC regime map)}\]
rsi_14
14-period Relative Strength Index on the asset close at the live snapshot (forming + terminal; feature_builder: RSIIndicator(close, window=14)).
\[U_{t}=\max(C_{t}-C_{t-1},0),\quad D_{t}=\max(C_{t-1}-C_{t},0)\]
\[\mathrm{RS}=\dfrac{\mathrm{SMA}(U,14)}{\mathrm{SMA}(D,14)}\]
\[\mathrm{RSI}_{14}=100-\dfrac{100}{1+\mathrm{RS}}\]
geom_height
Pattern height as a percentage of price at detection. Exact definition depends on pattern family (trendline channel vs double/triple vs cup vs H&S).
Trendline patterns (wedges / triangles / channels):
\[h_{\mathrm{start}}=R_{\mathrm{start}}-S_{\mathrm{start}}\]
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}=\dfrac{h_{\mathrm{start}}}{S_{\mathrm{start}}}\times 100\]
Double bottom / double top:
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}^{\mathrm{DB}}=\dfrac{N-\min(B_{1},B_{2})}{N}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}^{\mathrm{DT}}=\dfrac{\max(T_{1},T_{2})-N}{N}\times 100\]
Head & shoulders: absolute head-to-neckline height on the formation.
\[\mathrm{geom\_height}^{\mathrm{HS}}=\lvert h_{\mathrm{head}}\rvert\]
geom_width
Pattern duration in candles from formation start index to end index.
\[\mathrm{geom\_width}=i_{\mathrm{end}}-i_{\mathrm{start}}\]
geom_breakout_potential
Detector score of breakout likelihood from geometry. Definition is pattern-specific (e.g. cup depth for cup-and-handle; height/width/R² blend for H&S).
Cup & handle:
\[\mathrm{geom\_breakout\_potential}\approx\mathrm{cup\_depth}\]
Head & shoulders (clamped to [0, 1]):
\[\mathrm{geom\_breakout\_potential}=f\!\left(\tfrac{h_{\mathrm{head}}}{P_{\mathrm{head}}},\,w,\,R^{2}\right)\]
geom_resistance_slope
Slope of the fitted resistance / upper trendline, expressed as percent price change per candle.
Fit through resistance pivots:
\[P\approx a+b\,i\]
\[\mathrm{geom\_resistance\_slope}=b_{\%/c}\]
btc_dist14_mean
Mean of BTC last-14 percentage distances (feature_builder dist14_mean on BTC).
\[\delta_{i}=\dfrac{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t-i}-C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}\times 100,\quad i=1,\ldots,14\]
\[\mathrm{btc\_dist14\_mean}=\dfrac{1}{14}\sum_{i=1}^{14}\delta_{i}\]
current_scale_number
Position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout)
geom_hs_completion_score
Head-and-shoulders completion / quality score from the detector.
\[\mathrm{geom\_hs\_completion\_score}\in[0,1]\]
geom_hs_symmetry_score
Head-and-shoulders left/right shoulder symmetry score from the detector.
\[\mathrm{geom\_hs\_symmetry\_score}\in[0,1]\]

Frequently asked questions

How to trade Reverse Head & Shoulders using this crypto chart pattern study?

This page reports historical Reverse Head & Shoulders breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates on Binance USD-M futures. Use the rates, typical travel, and timeframe tables as educational context — not a live trade signal.

Do Reverse Head & Shoulders chart patterns work?

Reverse Head & Shoulders was evaluated on 13,479 deduplicated snapshots across 664 Binance USD-M futures symbols. Exclusive outcomes below show how often the pattern broke out, broke down, or stayed sideways — not a guarantee that any single setup will follow the average.

What is the sample size for Reverse Head & Shoulders?

Reverse Head & Shoulders was evaluated on 13,479 deduplicated snapshots across 664 Binance USD-M futures symbols.

How is the pattern end candle chosen for Reverse Head & Shoulders?

For Reverse Head & Shoulders, pattern end is the neckline break confirmation candle. All features and the next-20-candle study window begin at that bar, measuring downside continuation (−1.0× NATR from neckline) vs invalidation.

Reverse Head & Shoulders breakout rate: how often does Reverse Head & Shoulders break out, break down, or go sideways?

Under a mutually exclusive ±1× NATR / 20-candle classification, breakout was 70.69%, breakdown 28.0%, and sideways 1.31%; expected-direction hit rate was 70.69%.

Which timeframe works best for Reverse Head & Shoulders in this study?

Among timeframes present, 1d had the highest expected-direction hit rate at 73.87% (n=310).

What feature correlates most with Reverse Head & Shoulders breakouts?

Within Reverse Head & Shoulders only, the strongest Spearman correlate of breakout success was current_scale_number (ρ=0.2882***, n=7,924). Effect sizes remain modest.

Is this financial advice?

No. These are educational historical statistics only. Past pattern outcomes do not guarantee future results.

Watch Reverse Head & Shoulders live

ChartDatabase scans this pattern across 500+ Binance futures pairs with alerts.

How to cite this study

ChartDatabase Research Team (2026). “Reverse Head & Shoulders: Breakout & Breakdown Statistics on Binance Futures (n=13,479).” In What Actually Drives Crypto Chart Pattern Breakouts? ChartDatabase. https://chartdatabase.com/research/reverse_head_and_shoulders/