Skip to main content

Research · Pattern studies · Double Bottom

ChartDatabase Research · Chart pattern study

Double Bottom Pattern

Timeframe

1h timeframe — 866 snapshots across 426 Binance USDT‑M futures markets — bullish bias. Results are not mixed with other candle intervals.

Abstract

Double Bottom statistics on the 1h timeframe only (n=866). Timeframes are analyzed separately and never pooled — 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d horizons are not interchangeable. Use the timeframe control under the title to switch. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways: 69.63% / 16.4% / 13.97%.

Keywords Double Bottom patternDouble Bottom breakoutDouble Bottom cryptohow to trade Double BottomDouble Bottom success ratecrypto chart patternschart pattern success rate

Key results (1h only)

Key findings
  1. Double Bottom on 1h: n=866 snapshots across 426 coins — breakout 69.63%, breakdown 16.4%, sideways 13.97% (exclusive classes; not pooled with other timeframes).
  2. Expected-direction (bullish) hit rate on 1h: 69.63%.
  3. Mean max-up / max-down on 1h: 6.151% / -2.905% (MFE÷|MAE| ≈ 2.117); median 20-candle close return 1.392%.
Snapshots
866
Coins
426unique symbols
Hit rate
69.63%expected direction
Breakout
69.63%exclusive
Breakdown
16.4%exclusive
Sideways
13.97%neither
Median ret.
1.392%
MFE ÷ |MAE|
2.117

Scope for this pattern

  • Exchange / market: Binance USD-M Futures (perpetual contracts).
  • Pattern end: For Double Bottom, pattern end is the first neckline re-touch after the second extreme, within ±0.5× NATR(14) of the neckline. RSI, Fuel, and forward 20-candle outcomes are measured from that completion candle. Breakout requires clearing the neckline (+1.0× NATR); breakdown requires breaching the actual bottom support floor.
  • Active timeframe: 1h only — other intervals (15m, 1h, 4h, 1d) are available via the control under the title and are never mixed into these figures.
  • Outcome horizon: next 20 candles on the selected timeframe. Headline KPIs use pattern-end snapshots: mutually exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). Fuel and RSI bins on trendline families also report Forming (still inside the lines).

Results (1h)

Return distribution

All figures below are for Double Bottom on the 1h timeframe only (n=866). Timeframes are never pooled — a 15m candle horizon is not comparable to 1d. Mean return 2.092%, median 1.392%; exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways 69.63% / 16.4% / 13.97%. Mean MFE / MAE 6.151% / -2.905%.

Figure 1. 20-candle close return (%) for Double Bottom on 1h, clipped to ±16%.

Wick max-up / max-down over the same 20-candle window, expressed as NATR multiples. Sideways is not a spike at 0.

Figure 1b. 20-candle wick max-up (×NATR) on 1h.

Figure 1c. 20-candle wick max-down (×NATR).

Distribution statistics

  • Mean return: 2.092%
  • Median: 1.392% (P25 -0.769 · P75 4.46)
  • Std. deviation: 6.415%
  • Win rate (ret > 0): 65.24%
  • Mean MFE / MAE: 6.151% / -2.905%
  • Median max-up / max-down (×NATR): 2.274 / -1.061
  • Sideways rate: 13.97% (pattern-end unresolved; not a zero-move class; see ×NATR histograms)
  • Both-cleared (pre-label): 33.03%

Fuel volume & momentum scores

Fuel volume and momentum scores below use only Double Bottom snapshots on 1h. Zones match the live Fuel gauge (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg); each zone reports mean max-up / max-down over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

volume_score (n=866; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Double Bottom (1h), 866 snapshots with recorded Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 70.65% in Dead Water (0.00–0.33) to 67.45% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a material difference of -3.20 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 11.94% to 16.86% (+4.92 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 17.41% to 15.69% (-1.72 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 70.65% in Dead Water to 67.45% in The Powder Keg (-3.20 percentage points; material shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Organic Flow (6.440%), compared with 5.377% in Dead Water and 6.297% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 9% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel volume score (closed-candle volume vs SMA20 at the live snapshot) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Dead Water0.00–0.33
n=201
BO 70.65% BD 11.94% SW 17.41% FM 0.0%
Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=410
BO 70.49% BD 18.29% SW 11.22% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=255
BO 67.45% BD 16.86% SW 15.69% FM 0.0%

Double Bottom outcomes by Fuel volume score.

Empirical density of volume score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel volume score.

volume_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Dead Water 0.00–0.33 201 5.377 -2.606 70.65 11.94 17.41 0.0
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 410 6.44 -2.85 70.49 18.29 11.22 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 255 6.297 -3.23 67.45 16.86 15.69 0.0

momentum_score (n=866; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Double Bottom (1h), 866 snapshots with recorded Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) are partitioned into Fuel gauge zones (Dead Water / Organic Flow / The Powder Keg). Exclusive breakout rates run from 69.58% in Organic Flow (0.34–0.66) to 69.83% in The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00), a negligible difference of +0.25 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 18.49% to 8.38% (-10.11 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 11.93% to 21.79% (+9.86 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 69.58% in Organic Flow to 69.83% in The Powder Keg (+0.25 percentage points; negligible shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in The Powder Keg (7.240%), compared with 5.867% in Organic Flow and 7.240% in The Powder Keg. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 31% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on Fuel momentum score (RSI / ROC energy at the live snapshot, not direction) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Organic Flow0.34–0.66
n=687
BO 69.58% BD 18.49% SW 11.93% FM 0.0%
The Powder Keg0.67–1.00
n=179
BO 69.83% BD 8.38% SW 21.79% FM 0.0%

Double Bottom outcomes by Fuel momentum score.

Empirical density of momentum score for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip).

Distribution of Fuel momentum score.

momentum_score Fuel-zone stats (max-up / max-down).
Zone Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Organic Flow 0.34–0.66 687 5.867 -2.651 69.58 18.49 11.93 0.0
The Powder Keg 0.67–1.00 179 7.24 -3.879 69.83 8.38 21.79 0.0

Feature distributions vs max-up / max-down

Feature bins below use only Double Bottom snapshots on 1h. Each bin reports mean max-up (MFE) and mean max-down (MAE) over the next 20 1h candles.

Active timeframe: 1h — switch with the buttons under the pattern title.

Breakout Breakdown Sideways Forming

rsi_14 (n=866; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Double Bottom (1h), 866 snapshots with recorded 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 61.49% in the lowest quartile (30–50; 30–50) to 71.25% in the highest (50–70; 50–70), a substantial difference of +9.76 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 30.41% to 13.60% (-16.81 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 8.10% to 15.15% (+7.05 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 61.49% in 30–50 to 71.25% in 50–70 (+9.76 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in 30–50 (6.953%), compared with 6.953% in 30–50 and 5.946% in 50–70. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 13% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot alone does not isolate a trading rule.

30–50
n=148
BO 61.49% BD 30.41% SW 8.1% FM 0.0%
50–70
n=713
BO 71.25% BD 13.6% SW 15.15% FM 0.0%

Double Bottom outcomes by rsi 14.

The histogram shows the empirical density of rsi 14 for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of 14-period Relative Strength Index at the live snapshot.

rsi_14 bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
30–50 30–50 148 6.953 -2.091 61.49 30.41 8.1 0.0
50–70 50–70 713 5.946 -3.047 71.25 13.6 15.15 0.0

btc_dist14_mean (n=866; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Double Bottom (1h), 866 snapshots with recorded BTC last-14 mean distance are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 73.09% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -5.74 – -1.16) to 60.47% in the highest (Q4; -0.0796 – 6.52), a substantial difference of -12.62 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 12.11% to 27.91% (+15.80 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 14.80% to 11.62% (-3.18 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 73.09% in Q1 to 60.47% in Q4 (-12.62 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q2 (6.397%), compared with 6.305% in Q1 and 6.346% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 24% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on BTC last-14 mean distance alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-5.74 – -1.16
n=223
BO 73.09% BD 12.11% SW 14.8% FM 0.0%
Q2-1.16 – -0.522
n=211
BO 70.14% BD 12.32% SW 17.54% FM 0.0%
Q3-0.522 – -0.0796
n=217
BO 74.65% BD 13.36% SW 11.99% FM 0.0%
Q4-0.0796 – 6.52
n=215
BO 60.47% BD 27.91% SW 11.62% FM 0.0%

Double Bottom outcomes by btc mean.

The histogram shows the empirical density of btc mean for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of BTC last-14 mean distance.

btc_dist14_mean bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Q1 -5.74 – -1.16 223 6.305 -2.855 73.09 12.11 14.8 0.0
Q2 -1.16 – -0.522 211 6.397 -2.71 70.14 12.32 17.54 0.0
Q3 -0.522 – -0.0796 217 5.561 -2.859 74.65 13.36 11.99 0.0
Q4 -0.0796 – 6.52 215 6.346 -3.194 60.47 27.91 11.62 0.0

current_scale_number (n=866; forming + terminal snapshots)

Within Double Bottom (1h), 866 snapshots with recorded position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout) are split into feature quartiles. Exclusive breakout rates run from 58.99% in the lowest quartile (Q1; -0.0192 – 0.818) to 77.42% in the highest (Q4; 1.01 – 1.36), a substantial difference of +18.43 percentage points. Breakdown rates shift from 29.49% to 8.76% (-20.73 percentage points), while sideways incidence moves from 11.52% to 13.82% (+2.30 percentage points). Forming (still inside the lines) moves from 0.00% to 0.00% (0.00 percentage points). Expected-direction hit rate moves from 58.99% in Q1 to 77.42% in Q4 (+18.43 percentage points; substantial shift). Mean maximum favorable excursion is highest in Q1 (6.671%), compared with 6.671% in Q1 and 6.570% in Q4. The value histogram is unimodal around mid-range values (peak bin ≈ 18% of observed mass). Taken together, these contrasts speak to association strength rather than causal effect: conditioning on position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout) alone does not isolate a trading rule.

Q1-0.0192 – 0.818
n=217
BO 58.99% BD 29.49% SW 11.52% FM 0.0%
Q20.818 – 0.937
n=216
BO 68.52% BD 14.81% SW 16.67% FM 0.0%
Q30.937 – 1.01
n=216
BO 73.61% BD 12.5% SW 13.89% FM 0.0%
Q41.01 – 1.36
n=217
BO 77.42% BD 8.76% SW 13.82% FM 0.0%

Double Bottom outcomes by Pattern scale.

The histogram shows the empirical density of Pattern scale for this timeframe (1st–99th percentile clip where continuous).

Distribution of position in the live channel.

current_scale_number bin stats (max-up / max-down).
Bin Range n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ BO % BD % SW % FM %
Q1 -0.0192 – 0.818 217 6.671 -2.528 58.99 29.49 11.52 0.0
Q2 0.818 – 0.937 216 5.547 -3.127 68.52 14.81 16.67 0.0
Q3 0.937 – 1.01 216 5.812 -2.961 73.61 12.5 13.89 0.0
Q4 1.01 – 1.36 217 6.57 -3.005 77.42 8.76 13.82 0.0

Timeframe comparison

Side-by-side comparison across timeframes for Double Bottom. Each column is an independent sample — use it to contrast horizons, not as a pooled average.

Table. Double Bottom comparative outcomes by timeframe.
TF n Mean ↑ Mean ↓ ↑/|↓| Hit % BO % BD % SW %
15m 253 3.313 -1.308 2.533 75.89 75.89 12.65 11.46
1h 866 6.151 -2.905 2.117 69.63 69.63 16.4 13.97
4h 422 11.198 -4.5 2.488 72.04 72.04 10.9 17.06
1d 105 41.368 -11.474 3.605 77.14 77.14 12.38 10.48

Feature correlations

Within Double Bottom on 1h, the strongest absolute Spearman correlate of breakout is current_scale_number (ρ = 0.1619***). Ranks use pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features. * p<0.05 · ** p<0.01 · *** p<0.001.

vs Breakout success

Table 1. Top breakout correlates.
Featureρpn
current_scale_number *** 0.1619 0.000002 866
momentum_score * 0.0959 0.004719 866
btc_dist14_mean * -0.0752 0.026812 866
rsi_14 0.0508 0.135622 866
volume_score -0.0274 0.420293 866

vs Breakdown success

Table 2. Top breakdown correlates.
Featureρpn
current_scale_number *** -0.2066 0.0 866
momentum_score *** -0.2041 0.0 866
rsi_14 *** -0.1855 0.0 866
btc_dist14_mean *** 0.1377 0.000048 866
volume_score 0.0511 0.13328 866
Table 3. Top correlates of 20-candle close return.
Featureρpn
rsi_14 *** -0.1606 0.000002 866
btc_dist14_mean -0.0364 0.285094 866
current_scale_number -0.0284 0.403255 866
momentum_score -0.0147 0.665088 866
volume_score -0.0048 0.888642 866
Table 3b. Top correlates of 20-candle max-up (MFE).
Featureρpn
momentum_score *** 0.1675 0.000001 866
rsi_14 * -0.0838 0.013664 866
volume_score 0.0449 0.187176 866
btc_dist14_mean -0.0388 0.253641 866
current_scale_number -0.0144 0.672028 866
Table 3c. Top correlates of 20-candle max-down (MAE).
Featureρpn
momentum_score *** -0.2415 0.0 866
rsi_14 *** -0.2091 0.0 866
current_scale_number * -0.0893 0.008529 866
volume_score -0.0534 0.116248 866
btc_dist14_mean -0.0021 0.951605 866

Outcome mix by timeframe

Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways rates by candle timeframe (hover for exact values).

Figure 2. Stacked exclusive outcome rates by timeframe.

Timeframe breakdown

Table 6. Double Bottom split by timeframe.
TF n Coins Hit % BO % BD % SW % Med % Mean %
15m 253 196 75.89 75.89 12.65 11.46 0.952 1.371
1h 866 426 69.63 69.63 16.4 13.97 1.392 2.092
4h 422 284 72.04 72.04 10.9 17.06 2.59 3.38
1d 105 93 77.14 77.14 12.38 10.48 12.724 20.323

Methods note

Shared methodology (expand)

Pattern end for this study: For Double Bottom, pattern end is the first neckline re-touch after the second extreme, within ±0.5× NATR(14) of the neckline. RSI, Fuel, and forward 20-candle outcomes are measured from that completion candle. Breakout requires clearing the neckline (+1.0× NATR); breakdown requires breaching the actual bottom support floor.

Outcomes use mutually exclusive classes over the next 20 candles. Headline KPIs and geometry bins are pattern-end: breakout, breakdown, or sideways vs 1.0× NATR(14). On trendline families, Fuel / RSI bins add Forming (still inside the lines). Correlations are Spearman with two-sided p-values. See the research hub methods for universe, how every pattern family defines pattern end, dedupe keys, and limitations.

Exclusive class: upside clears +1× natr_14 within 20 candles before downside.
Exclusive class: downside clears −1× natr_14 within 20 candles before upside.
Pattern-end (terminal) unresolved class: neither +1× nor −1× natr_14 cleared within 20 candles after the breached candle. Headline KPIs, ranks, and geometry bins use this sample; Forming is not in that formula. Sideways is not a zero-move class; typical wick travel inside the bands is reported as ×NATR max-up / max-down.
Trendline families only, and only on non-terminal snapshots still inside the lines: neither side tagged within 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins add Forming so four exclusive classes sum to 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%.
$$\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}$$

Labels use ground-truth path outcomes (outcome_label / target_first_hit from full kline OHLC path). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Unresolved non-terminal trendline snapshots are Forming; unresolved terminal snapshots are Sideways. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open proximity, then candle body polarity, then return sign. Pattern-end headline rates: breakout + breakdown + sideways = 100%. Forming+terminal Fuel/RSI bins: breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%.

Limitations & disclosures

  1. This is a historical, in-sample statistical study — not a forward-tested trading strategy. It excludes exchange fees, funding rates, slippage, and execution timing, all of which affect real trading outcomes. A fixed temporal holdout split is reported in methodology for transparency; thresholds are not retuned on the holdout window.
  2. The dataset covers Binance USD-M perpetual futures only. Results may not generalize to spot markets, other exchanges, or lower-liquidity assets with different microstructure.
  3. Confidence and recency filters were switched off while building the dataset, so figures reflect the detector’s raw geometric/RSI trigger rate — not the filtered, higher-conviction signals surfaced live to subscribers.
  4. Exclusive breakout / breakdown / sideways labels use the first ±1.0× NATR threshold (or pattern-specific structural boundary) touched in candle order over the 20-candle forward horizon (target_first_hit / outcome_label). Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes against projected support/resistance bands. Double/triple bottoms require breaking the bottom support floor for breakdown. Head & shoulders evaluate from neckline confirmation. Same-bar dual clears resolve via open gap / nearer threshold from open, then candle body direction.
  5. Overlapping detections were deduplicated on formation start (longest span kept), but different pattern families can still fire on the same underlying move, so correlated market regimes (e.g. one broad rally) can inflate sample counts across several pattern types simultaneously.
  6. Spearman tables use Benjamini–Hochberg FDR q-values; stars also require |ρ| ≥ 0.05. Large samples can still make tiny associations look noteworthy without being economically meaningful. Primary correlations and lifts are within a single timeframe; multi-TF pooled tables are exploratory only.

Glossary

Bull flag / bullish flag
Common search names for the bullish flag chart pattern: a sharp advance (the pole) followed by a downward-sloping or rectangular consolidation. See the Bullish Flag pattern study for breakout statistics.
Head and shoulders pattern
A three-peak reversal pattern (left shoulder, head, right shoulder) with a neckline. Traders search this as “head and shoulders crypto” as well as the full name. See the Head and Shoulders study for exclusive breakdown rates.
Falling wedge bullish
A common query for the falling wedge: converging down-sloping trendlines often treated as a bullish continuation or reversal. See the Falling Wedge study.
Cup and handle pattern
A rounded-bottom continuation pattern with a shallow handle. Also searched as “cup and handle crypto”. See the Cup and Handle study for breakout rates.
Fuel gauge zones
Fixed partitions of Fuel component scores: Dead Water (0.00–0.33), Organic Flow (0.34–0.66), and The Powder Keg (0.67–1.00). Used for Fuel volume/momentum outcome charts on research pages.
NATR(14) & Formation Avg NATR
Normalized Average True Range over 14 periods — average candle range as a percentage of price. In this research, formation average NATR (natr_pattern_avg) is measured across the full pattern span to size breakout/breakdown thresholds (1.0× NATR) relative to market volatility rather than fixed percentages.
\[\mathrm{ATR}_{14}=\mathrm{AverageTrueRange}(H,L,C,14)\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{14}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ATR}_{14}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{NATR}_{\mathrm{avg}}=\dfrac{1}{N}\sum_{i=\mathrm{start}}^{\mathrm{end}}\mathrm{NATR}_{14,i}\]
Breakout / breakdown / sideways
Mutually exclusive outcome classes over the 20-candle forward horizon. Headline KPIs, ranks, and pattern-end geometry bins use breakout, breakdown, and sideways (sum to 100%). Breakout means the +1.0× NATR(14) upside threshold (or resistance trendline/neckline) is touched first; breakdown is the downside class; sideways on those samples means the pattern-end candle already tagged a line but neither ±1.0× NATR printed in the next 20 candles. Sideways is not a zero-move class: typical inside-band wick travel is the sideways ×NATR max-up / max-down. Trendline families evaluate confirmed candle closes.
\[\mathrm{Sideways}\iff\text{terminal and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Forming (trendline still inside)
Fourth exclusive class on trendline families (triangles, wedges, channels, flags, pennants) for snapshots that are not the last candle of the formation: price is still between the lines and neither side tagged in the next 20 candles. Age-balanced Fuel / RSI / point-in-time bins report breakout + breakdown + sideways + forming = 100%. Forming-only trees (live still-inside matches) use breakout + breakdown + forming = 100%. Non-trendline patterns have forming_rate 0.
\[\mathrm{Forming}\iff\text{still inside trendlines and no }\pm 1.0\times\mathrm{NATR}\text{ tag within }20\text{ candles}\]
Both-cleared rate
Share of windows where both +1.0× and −1.0× NATR thresholds were cleared within the 20-candle forward horizon before the exclusive label was assigned. High both-cleared rates indicate volatile two-sided windows.
Expected-direction hit rate
For patterns with a directional bias (e.g. bullish patterns expect a breakout, bearish patterns expect a breakdown), this is the exclusive-class rate for that expected side only. Neutral patterns report breakout and breakdown separately.
Spearman ρ (rho)
A rank correlation coefficient between −1 and 1 that measures monotonic association without assuming a linear relationship or normal distribution — appropriate for skewed, fat-tailed return data. Tables emphasize pattern geometry, momentum, and BTC-context features.
p-value, q-value & significance stars
Two-sided Spearman p-values are adjusted with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR (q-values). Stars require q < 0.05 and |ρ| ≥ 0.05 so large-n micro correlations are not marked significant. Always read stars with effect size.
Wilson 95% CI
Outcome rate fields ending in _ci95 are Wilson score intervals for the binomial point estimate. They quantify sampling uncertainty on rates, not trading risk or costs.
Null baseline / temporal holdout
Null baseline shuffles exclusive outcomes within each timeframe to show a chance expected-direction hit band. Temporal holdout compares rates before vs on/after a fixed cutoff (thresholds not retuned on holdout).
MFE / MAE
Maximum Favorable Excursion and Maximum Adverse Excursion — the best and worst price movement recorded within the forward horizon, expressed as a percentage of the snapshot close. MFE÷|MAE| summarizes average upside versus downside excursion magnitude.
\[\mathrm{MFE}=\mathrm{max\_up}_{20c}=\dfrac{\max(H_{t+1},\ldots,H_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
\[\mathrm{MAE}=\mathrm{max\_down}_{20c}=\dfrac{\min(L_{t+1},\ldots,L_{t+20})-C_{t}}{C_{t}}\times 100\]
Timeframe-specific feature bins
On each pattern study, feature distributions are computed separately for 15m, 1h, 4h, and 1d. Use the timeframe control to switch; never treat pooled multi-TF histograms as interchangeable because candle horizons differ.
Feature quartile bins
Numeric features that are not Fuel, RSI, or σ-banded (e.g. slopes, current_scale_number, btc_dist14_mean) are split into quartiles. Each bin reports exclusive breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates plus mean MFE.
Feature typical / elevated bands
geom_width and head-and-shoulders symmetry use mean ± σ bands computed separately per pattern and timeframe: below typical (< μ−σ), typical (μ±σ), elevated (μ+σ to μ+2σ), and extreme (> μ+2σ). Pattern height and extension age use the same labels after a log1p transform so right-tailed size features are not dominated by outliers. Bins are never pooled across timeframes.
Pattern end (snapshot candle)
The single candle where features (RSI, Fuel, BTC context) and the forward 20-candle outcome window are measured. Trendline families use the last close still inside ±0.5× NATR of the projected channel; doubles/triples use a neckline re-touch within ±0.5× NATR; H&S uses the neckline break; cup & handle uses the rim touch after the handle; RSI divergences use the second price extreme. See Data & methodology for the full family list.
BTC regime (btc_dist14_median)
Terciles of BTC last-14 median distance at the live snapshot (btc_weak / btc_mid / btc_strong). Used as a simple proxy for BTC-relative market regime when slicing outcome rates (not in correlation ranks).
volume_score (Fuel volume)
Closed-candle volume vs a 20-period SMA, mapped to 0–1 with a small trend adjustment. Same Fuel Index volume component as the live gauge; open (forming) candle is not used.
\[\mathrm{volume\_ratio}=\dfrac{V_{t}}{\mathrm{SMA}(V,20)}\]
Piecewise base score from volume_ratio:
\[\mathrm{ratio}<0.8:\ \mathrm{base}=\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}}{0.8}\times 0.25\]
\[0.8\le\mathrm{ratio}\le 1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.3+\dfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-0.8}{0.7}\times 0.3\]
\[\mathrm{ratio}>1.5:\ \mathrm{base}=0.6+\min\!\bigl(1,\tfrac{\mathrm{ratio}-1.5}{1.5}\bigr)\times 0.4\]
\[\mathrm{trend\_adj}=\mathrm{clamp}(s_{V}\times 0.15,-0.05,+0.05)\]
\[\mathrm{volume\_score}=\mathrm{clamp}(\mathrm{base}+\mathrm{trend\_adj},\,0,\,1)\]
momentum_score (Fuel momentum)
Direction-agnostic energy score from RSI(14), 3-bar RSI change, and timeframe-specific ROC. Same Fuel Index momentum component as the live gauge.
\[\mathrm{ROC}=\dfrac{C_{t}-C_{t-N}}{C_{t-N}}\]
\[\Delta\mathrm{RSI}_{3}=\mathrm{RSI}_{t}-\mathrm{RSI}_{t-3}\]
ROC lookback N by timeframe: 15m→8, 1h→5, 4h→3, 1d→2.
\[\mathrm{momentum\_score}\in[0,1]\ \text{(RSI/ROC regime map)}\]
rsi_14
14-period Relative Strength Index on the asset close at the live snapshot (forming + terminal; feature_builder: RSIIndicator(close, window=14)).
\[U_{t}=\max(C_{t}-C_{t-1},0),\quad D_{t}=\max(C_{t-1}-C_{t},0)\]
\[\mathrm{RS}=\dfrac{\mathrm{SMA}(U,14)}{\mathrm{SMA}(D,14)}\]
\[\mathrm{RSI}_{14}=100-\dfrac{100}{1+\mathrm{RS}}\]
btc_dist14_mean
Mean of BTC last-14 percentage distances (feature_builder dist14_mean on BTC).
\[\delta_{i}=\dfrac{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t-i}-C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}{C^{\mathrm{BTC}}_{t}}\times 100,\quad i=1,\ldots,14\]
\[\mathrm{btc\_dist14\_mean}=\dfrac{1}{14}\sum_{i=1}^{14}\delta_{i}\]
current_scale_number
Position in the live channel (0 at support, 1 at resistance, >1 breakout)

Frequently asked questions

How to trade Double Bottom using this crypto chart pattern study?

This page reports historical Double Bottom breakout, breakdown, and sideways rates on Binance USD-M futures. Use the rates, typical travel, and timeframe tables as educational context — not a live trade signal.

Do Double Bottom chart patterns work?

Double Bottom was evaluated on 1,646 deduplicated snapshots across 553 Binance USD-M futures symbols. Exclusive outcomes below show how often the pattern broke out, broke down, or stayed sideways — not a guarantee that any single setup will follow the average.

What is the sample size for Double Bottom?

Double Bottom was evaluated on 1,646 deduplicated snapshots across 553 Binance USD-M futures symbols.

How is the pattern end candle chosen for Double Bottom?

For Double Bottom, pattern end is the first neckline re-touch after the second extreme, within ±0.5× NATR(14) of the neckline. RSI, Fuel, and forward 20-candle outcomes are measured from that completion candle. Breakout requires clearing the neckline (+1.0× NATR); breakdown requires breaching the actual bottom support floor.

Double Bottom breakout rate: how often does Double Bottom break out, break down, or go sideways?

Under a mutually exclusive ±1× NATR / 20-candle classification, breakout was 71.69%, breakdown 14.16%, and sideways 14.15%; expected-direction hit rate was 71.69%.

Which timeframe works best for Double Bottom in this study?

Among timeframes present, 1d had the highest expected-direction hit rate at 77.14% (n=105).

What feature correlates most with Double Bottom breakouts?

Within Double Bottom only, the strongest Spearman correlate of breakout success was current_scale_number (ρ=0.1619***, n=866). Effect sizes remain modest.

Is this financial advice?

No. These are educational historical statistics only. Past pattern outcomes do not guarantee future results.

Watch Double Bottom live

ChartDatabase scans this pattern across 500+ Binance futures pairs with alerts.

How to cite this study

ChartDatabase Research Team (2026). “Double Bottom: Breakout & Breakdown Statistics on Binance Futures (n=1,646).” In What Actually Drives Crypto Chart Pattern Breakouts? ChartDatabase. https://chartdatabase.com/research/double_bottom/